Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It was Halliburton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:12 PM
Original message
It was Halliburton
The chain reaction behind what some fear will be the worst oil spill in the industry's history was revealed by Robert Bea, a University of California Berkeley engineering professor who worked for the British oil company as a risk assessment consultant during the 1990s. He was passed documents and a tape from the BP inquiry by others within the industry.

According to the account he has pieced together, a group of BP executives were on board the Deepwater Horizon rig celebrating the project's safety record while, far below, the exploration well was being converted for oil production.

The workers set and then tested a cement seal at the bottom of the well, he believes, but - as they reduced the pressure in the drill column and attempted to set a second seal below the sea floor - a chemical reaction caused by the setting cement created heat.

That heat converted a pocket of methane crystals into a bubble of compressed gas which grew as it rose up the drill column.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/7696596/BP-oil-disaster-how-a-deadly-methane-bubble-triggered-explosion.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. k&r! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. It seems to me that they trying to rush this well into production.
That is what I get from what I have been reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. As soon as I read their name on the list of companies involved with the rig,
I just knew that their negligence HAD to be a contributory factor....

I hope that Cheney still owns lots of their stock and he loses everything!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hate to keep repeating this RE: Halliburton:
Halliburton to Buy Boots & Coots, Adding Oil-Well Firefighting Services
by on APRIL 10, 2010

By Vivek Shankar April 10 (Bloomberg) — Halliburton Co. agreed to buy Boots & Coots Inc. for about $240.4 million in stock and cash, adding equipment and services to fight oil-well fires. Boots & Coots holders will receive $1.73 in cash and $1.27 in Halliburton stock per share, Halliburton said in a statement yesterday. The combined price, $3, is 28 percent more than Boots & Coots’ closing price yesterday. Both companies are based in Houston. The addition of Boots & Coots will allow Halliburton to offer a more complete suite of services to customers, said Marc Edwards , a senior vice president. Halliburton is the world’s second-largest oil-field services company after Schlumberger Ltd. Edward “Coots” Matthews , who died on March 31 at 86, founded the company in 1978 along with Asger “Boots” Hansen . For 20 years prior to that, they had worked with Red Adair, whose skill at battling oil-well fires was portrayed in the 1968 movie “Hellfighters,” starring John Wayne as Adair. Both Matthews and Hansen were involved in fighting well- known oil-well blowouts, including the “Devil’s Cigarette Lighter” in Gassil Touil, Algeria, in 1961 and another at Lake Maracaibo in 1991. They also extinguished the fires from 700 oil wells in Kuwait, blazes set by retreating Iraqi troops near the end of the first Gulf War in 1991, according to the company. For 2009, Boots & Coots reported net income of $6 million, or 8 cents a share, on revenue of $195.1 million. Halliburton said the boards of both companies had approved the transaction and it will close this summer. Boots & Coots had 80.13 million shares outstanding as of March 2, according to Bloomberg data. The stock fell 3 cents to $2.35 yesterday. It’s up 42 percent for the year. Halliburton fell 9 cents to $31.57 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading yesterday. The shares have climbed 4.9 percent this year. To contact the reporter on this story: Vivek Shankar in San Francisco at vshankar3@bloomberg.net


http://industry-news.org/2010/04/10/halliburton-to-buy-boots-coots-adding-oil-well-firefighting-services/


Coinkydink? or follow the money ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. So, first they help set the fires, and then make money putting them out...or
at least trying to put them out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. now if they'd just buy a containment company
maybe they could stop this under sea gusher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Have you seen this powerpoint?

Deepwater Cementing Considerations to Prevent Hydrates Destabillity


From Halliburton’s presentation (large pdf), page 10, last November (my bold):

Challenges

• Shallow water flow may occur during or after cement job
• Under water blow out has happened
• Gas flow may occur after a cement job in deepwater environments that contain major hydrate zones.
• Destabilization of hydrates after the cement job is confirmed by downhole cameras.
• The gas flow could slow down in hours to days if the de- stabilization is not severe.
• However, the consequences could be more severe in worse cases.

Page 13 lists the design objectives but then concedes they can’t all be met at once:

Deepwater Well Objectives
• Cement slurry should be placed in the entire annulus with no losses
• Temperature increase during slurry hydration should not destabilize hydrates
• There should be no influx of shallow water or gas into the annulus
• The cement slurry should develop strength in the shortest time after placement
Conditions in deepwater wells are not
conducive to achieving all of these
objectives simultaneously

http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/44349



Can anyone put this in video form, I'm clueless on how to do that.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. No, I had not seen that
They said annulus


Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. So, in effect, they KNEW it would not work...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It sure looks like it.
Especially considering the fact that they (Haliburton) bought a well-know rig fire fighting corp. (See modmom's post above).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Did you doubt it
after all why do you think cheney went to LA with scalia on that hunting trip. You know the one where scalia came back and voted against making cheney show just who attended that energy meeting. It had to be Halliburton and cheney just wanted to protect all that stock = I heard up to 40,000 shares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. April 2009 the Int Dept exempted BP from the Env Impact Study---would have prohibited the project
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. I see the barracuda is sticking her big nose into this...
The most prominent critic of overseas influence in US oil industry last week was Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican vice presidential candidate, who used Twitter to warn Americans not to trust "foreign" energy companies – comments that surprised some as her husband Todd worked for BP in Alaska's oilfields for 18 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. BP lied to Haliburton about depth of drilling; told Hal it was 16K ft, but it was >30K ft.
BP has a history of lies, and they lied to Haliburton.

Does this exhonerate Haliburton? They have blood on their hands. But in this case, they were given the specs and made a concrete seal for one pressure/depth assessment, when it was actually roughly twice the depth

so it was BP, AND this project would not have gone forward if BP had not been exempted by Int Dept from required Environmental Impact Study
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Amborin, thats what I've read as well...
that the drillers went down almost 36,000 feet instead of the 18,000 feet as planned. When the Haliburton crew calculated the amount and type of cement, the calculation was for the 18,000 foot planned hole. Wonder what the pressure differences might have been when this one blew?

BP has done this before, drilled far deeper than planned and failed to inform the calculating crews of this fact. Result was the same.

In a real investigation, rather than a whitewash, BP would come out the final villains. In the meantime, look at the damage being caused.

So far, no one has mentioned what effect, if any, the outflow from the Mississippi River is doing to this spill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Was BP involved in the other Haliburton cement-related oil-rig fire that occured
off the coast of Australia?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/30/halliburton-may-be-culpri_n_558481.html

Last year, Halliburton was also implicated for its cementing work prior to a massive blowout off the coast of Australia, where a rig caught on fire and spewed hundreds of thousands of gallons into the sea for ten weeks.

In that incident, workers apparently failed to properly pump cement into the well, according to Elmer Danenberger, former head of regulatory affairs for the U.S. Minerals Management Service, who testified to an Australian commission probing that accident.

"The problem with the cementing job was one of the root causes in the Australian blowout," Danenberger told Huffington Post, adding that the rig crew didn't pick up on indications of an influx of fluids coming back in after they cemented the casing. "The crew didn't pick up on them and didn't take action."

Halliburton declined to return a detailed request for comment from Huffington Post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Sure, BP lies they all do, but I bet they run that clunker past their mechanics...
If Halliburton didn't already know, which they had to - there's a white doy in merh's PP post pretty much right on top of the problem area. The profit via cost overruns must be a tremendous markup on a cost+ contract when knowing the difference in advance. For all these kinds of war & distress profiteers it is all one big gooey "it could take six days, six weeks...I doubt six months" frame of mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. Halliburton is always there, the fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. LOVE the title of this article:Deepwater Horizon oil spill: Is this Halliburton's Katrina?
http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/deepwater-horizon-disaster-directly-links-h

The failed blowout valve? It was manufactured by Cameron International. One look at Cameron's board should tell you all you need to know. They're all Bush/Cheney contractor cronies, here and around the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. There's the argument against Halliburton thinking that with Dick in the wheelhouse...
They no longer had to sweat the small stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
21. Maybe this was an intentional accident as if to threaten or like a child having a tantrum.
Just wondering.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Cui bono?
"Who benefits"? ... Economically? The oil companies. Politically? Not Obama -- he defended offshore drilling as "accident-proof". Politcally? Not Obama -- the economic chaos that will result in the Southeast will consolidate Tea Party (disenfranchised Southern) anger and further pressure Obama.

Seems like the same petroleum cabal that has always swirled around U.S. conspiracy events for the past 70 years.

Just wondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC