Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woman Prisoner Sent to Solitary for Reporting Rape by Guard

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:13 AM
Original message
Woman Prisoner Sent to Solitary for Reporting Rape by Guard
Edited on Mon May-10-10 09:14 AM by Are_grits_groceries
Michelle Ortiz was serving one year at the Ohio Reformatory for Women, a state prison in Marysville, when she was molested by a male guard. A recent article in the Columbus Dispatch describes what happened next:

When Ortiz reported the first assault to prison official Paula Jordan, the official told the inmate that the male guard was being transferred from the facility and was "just a dirty old man." That same evening, the male guard assaulted her again.

Rebecca Bright, another prison official who launched an investigation, ordered Ortiz placed in solitary confinement, where she was handcuffed. Bright reportedly argued that Ortiz was talking about the incident with other inmates.

Other accounts were more specific: In the first assault, Ortiz was "fondled" by the guard, who then told her "I'll get you tomorrow, watch." In the second, which took place after she had appealed for help, the guard returned while Ortiz was asleep and raped her. The assaults took place back in 1996. Subsequently, Ortiz sued both prison officials in federal court for doing nothing to protect her from the guard and punishing her instead. A jury awarded her $625,000 in damages.

But Bright and Jordan appealed the verdict, and the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals "ruled 2-1 that the prison officials had qualified immunity, shielding them from paying damages" to Ortiz. The third judge, however, issued an outraged dissent.

There's more: http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/05/woman-prisoner-sent-solitary-reporting-rape-guard

SCOTUS has agreed to hear arguments in the fall over the appellate court's ruling.

Why do people wonder why prisoners who are released have more problems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. rape in prisons/jails has to stop! hear that Obama!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why is the guard not in prison?
He is a rapist. He deserves nothing less. Were I on his jury, I would ask for the death penalty. I would do so for all rapists convicted. Anyone who feels they can force themselves on someone else deserves to die....period! I have no compassion for criminals, other than maybe those who steal food to survive.

All rapists should die. They have no respect for others, therfore they should receive none whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hey - if the President can authorize the slaughter of innocent millions
.
.
.


what's the big deal about a wee prison rape?

THIS IS THE USA!!!

We do whatever we want.

WHENEVER

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC