Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let’s Hold Benedict Arnold Billionaire Warren Buffett Accountable

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 04:39 PM
Original message
Let’s Hold Benedict Arnold Billionaire Warren Buffett Accountable
http://www.alternet.org/story/146795/let%E2%80%99s_hold_benedict_arnold_billionaire_warren_buffett_accountable/

Buffett has taken to arguing that his own questionable derivatives should be shielded from government regulators.
May 9, 2010 |


The derivatives genie is now well out of the bottle, and these instruments will almost certainly multiply in variety and number until some event makes their toxicity clear. Central banks and governments have so far found no effective way to control, or even monitor, the risks posed by these contracts. In my view, derivatives are financial weapons of mass destruction, carrying dangers that, while now latent, are potentially lethal. (Berkshire Hathaway annual report, 2002)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Florida Blue Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I delt in derivatives before I ever heard the term.
They were sow belly futures to me. And contracted soybeans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Some derivatives are okay
Commodities futures help to stabilize the price of food. If Heinz knows six months out what the price of tomatoes is going to be, they can plan better.

OTOH, naked Credit Default Swaps and a lot of Collateralized Debt Obligations are just plain evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coco2 Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. it is time for some to face reality...
Warren Buffett is a businessman, a highly successful one. That he affable and looks like your favorite uncle, or grandad changes nothing. He made his fortune by buying and selling companies and selling them. To do that successfully requires a certain philosophy...and it most assuredly is not altruistic, nor charitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. If you are looking for reality, DU is not always the right place to come.
There are undoubtedly some here who would shake their fists at the sky and rant about how god should be held accountable for all the deaths and atrocities committed in that supposed deity's name. And they would do this in all seriousness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coco2 Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL, I have to agree whole heartedly! thanks for the chuckle! n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. I heard that Moody's CEO and Buffett sold off their
Moody's stock when they heard that the firm was about to be investigated by the Feds. The entire financial system is taking down the planet with levels of corruption unheard of in the history of mankind.

http://www.businessinsider.com/moodys-ceo-dumped-stock-sec-wells-notice-2010-5
<snip>
We think Moody's (MCO) should have immediately announced that the SEC had served it with a "Wells Notice" on March 18th, when the Wells Notice arrived, instead of waiting two months and disclosing this news in its 10Q.

The SEC gives companies and individuals "Wells Notices" when it it is gearing up to file formal complaints against them. In this case, the SEC says the Wells Notice may be followed by a "cease-and-desist" that would revoke Moody's license to be a ratings agency.

We think Moody's investors would have regarded the receipt of this Wells Notice as "material non-public information" (especially those who bought the stock in the past 7 weeks without knowing that the company was sitting on a Wells Notice.)

We suspect Moody's investors will also be interested to know that CEO Raymond McDaniel dumped 100,000 shares of stock at $29 a share the day the Wells Notice arrived. And that Berkshire Hathaway (BRK) sold ~678,000 shares that day and another ~300,000 or so in the week that followed.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/moodys-ceo-dumped-stock-sec-wells-notice-2010-5#ixzz0nZ86XhXV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC