Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Los Angeles approves Arizona boycott over immigration law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:43 PM
Original message
Los Angeles approves Arizona boycott over immigration law


Los Angeles approves Arizona boycott over immigration law
by Christina Hoag - May. 12, 2010 12:48 PM
Associated Press

LOS ANGELES - Los Angeles on Wednesday became the largest city yet to boycott Arizona over its tough new law targeting illegal immigration in a move that likely will affect some $8 million in contracts with the state.

The City Council voted 13-1 to bar Los Angeles from conducting business with Arizona unless the law is repealed. The vote followed an emotional council discussion during which many members noted that their ancestors were U.S. immigrants.

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa already has said he would approve the boycott.

The proposal could affect investments and contracts worth as much as $52 million, including contracts for airport, harbor and trucking services, according to a report from the city's chief legislative analyst. That report recommends the council consider suspending travel, cutting contracts and refraining from making any new ones with Arizona-based companies.

But Councilwoman Janice Hahn, who co-authored the resolution, said it would be impractical to cancel most of those deals and only about $7 million to $8 million in city contracts probably would be affected.

"US Airways is based in Arizona and they certainly fly in and out (of Los Angeles)" and it would hardly be feasible to end those flights, Hahn said before the council vote.

Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/05/12/20100512los-angeles-boycott-vote-over-arizona-immigration-law12-ON.html#ixzz0nl31TqHl



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think the councilwoman needs to put her thinking cap on
The legislation is to stop the CITY from doing business with the Police State of AZ

NOT to stop private airlines from flying between the states.

Jeebus, this dimwit coauthored this legislation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's already been reported in LBN that
AZ has lost $19 Million in revenue from boycotts and this is $7 or $8 million more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes, the pressure is growing, isn't it? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, of course they do
Being right next door, they can offer potential customers all the same amenities and none of the political incorrectness.

:eyes:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombero1956 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. and yet Worcester Mass refused to go along with the boycott
http://www.telegram.com/article/20100511/NEWS/100519924/1116/NEWSREWIND

The City Council tonight stopped in its tracks a move to have it go on record in opposition to the controversial new immigration law in Arizona.

By a 7-4 vote, the council overturned a ruling made by Mayor Joseph C. O'Brien that discussion of the Arizona law was germane to city business.

The mayor's ruling was challenged by District 3 Councilor Paul P. Clancy Jr., who argued the issue did not fall under the council's jurisdiction under its rules.

Rule 33 prohibits any petition or resolution from being taken up by the council if the subject matter does not fall under the purview of city government.

When the council sustained the challenge of Mr. O'Brien's ruling, it in effect stopped further council discussion of the matter.

This same council recently voted to boycott the Sudanese government because of the Darfur genocide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's too bad..so they approve of AZ racist law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good, I hope this grows until they learn that
bigoted laws won't fly with the rest of the country.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC