Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP plan: Let's trust BP to pay what it owes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 03:59 PM
Original message
GOP plan: Let's trust BP to pay what it owes
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/5/17/866965/-GOP-plan:-Lets-trust-BP-to-pay-what-it-owes?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dailykos%2Findex+%28Daily+Kos%29

GOP plan: Let's trust BP to pay what it owes
by Jed Lewison

Video at link~

Mon May 17, 2010 at 08:00:03 AM PDT

Well this sounds like a really stupid plan:

MR. GREGORY: What about the issue of legitimate claims, as BP said, that it will honor? Do you think that the cap for damages should be higher now, higher than $75 million, as you heard Senator Schumer say they would propose?

SEN. McCONNELL: Well, the danger in that, of course, is that if you raise the cap too high, there will be no competition in the Gulf and you’ll leave all the business to the big guys like BP. What BP has said they need to be held to, which is they’re going to pay for this. They ought to pay for it, and they will pay for it. But the danger of taking the cap too high is that you end up with only massive, very large oil producers able to meet that cap and produce in the Gulf.


McConnell says he's concerned that a high cap would discourage companies from drilling offshore. But if they can't afford to pay for the damage that drilling can cause, why should they drill in the first place?

It's hard to defend any sort of liability cap on oil companies, let alone a $75 million cap. Why should they be entitled to unlimited profits if they can't be held accountable for unlimited damage?

But let's pretend that McConnell's objection were valid. If so, the proper solution would be to tie the liability limit to the size of the company. But he's not proposing that, underscoring his utter lack of sincerity.

Mitch McConnell believes that BP will voluntarily agree to waive the liability cap. Rather, he says he believes that, because he can't really be so dumb as to believe BP won't try to screw over as many people as possible as soon as the spotlight is off them.

In fact, even with the spotlight still on BP, it's already making moves to limit its exposure. Yet McConnell dishonestly urges us to trust BP's promise to pay every claim. That's crazy. The only thing we can really trust is that big oil is going to line Mitch McConnell's pockets and those of his Republican colleagues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Right Mitch, because Big Oil has a long history of being fair, honest, and cooperative.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. If they can't afford to clean up their mess...
...they can't afford to be in the business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Riiiiiight. Because corporations *always* do the right thing!
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
complain jane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well we trusted them to know what they were doing in the first place, how'd that turn out?
And we trusted them to have the proper safety equipment for what they were doing, and that went FAIL so they could save some money.

So why not trust them to pay what they owe?

What could happen?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great idea! What could possibly go wrong?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Does Mitch McConnell even have an original thought of his own? Did he ever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. What a dick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC