Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Secret order prepares new US wars in Middle East and Central Asia

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 01:46 AM
Original message
Secret order prepares new US wars in Middle East and Central Asia
A front-page article in Tuesday’s New York Times reveals the existence of a secret directive signed by Gen. David Petraeus, chief of the US Central Command, ordering the expansion of covert military operations throughout the Middle East, Central Asia and the Horn of Africa. The seven-page document, entitled “Joint Unconventional Warfare Task Force Execute Order,” essentially provides the US military with a blank check to carry out aggressive acts against virtually any country.

Issued in September 2009, the order calls for the creation of a network of covert task forces and intelligence-gathering units which will “penetrate, disrupt, defeat or destroy” any target within any country designated by the US military. These forces will carry out clandestine operations which “cannot or will not be accomplished” through other military means.

Once inside the targeted country, US forces will also “prepare the environment” for full-scale military assaults. In addition to military personnel, the Times reports, Petraeus’s order enlists “foreign business people, academics or others” in “persistent situational awareness” efforts—in other words, in spying.

The US will target countries considered hostile as well as countries with which it has maintained friendly relations. Among the countries cited by the Times as potential targets are Iran, Saudi Arabia and Somalia. The Times also reports that the document “appears to authorize specific operations in Iran, most likely to gather intelligence about the country’s nuclear program or identify dissident groups that might be useful for a future military offensive.”

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/may2010/petr-m26.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. If it's a secret order, why are we reading about it?

I guarantee you, if they didn't want us to be reading about it, the NYT would've never seen it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They'd have seen it. They just wouldn't have printed it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. depends on which faction is fighting with which faction.
Edited on Wed May-26-10 02:19 AM by Hannah Bell
"they" aren't a united front on foreign policy -- or anything except keeping the serfs in their place.

leaks = political weapons.

of course, it could be as you say as well -- someone wants the serfs to see it, for whatever reason.

however, unless the story is forged from whole cloth - it existed & has only been revealed recently.

& if this story has been forged from whole cloth, then pretty much anything that can't be seen with your own eyes is suspect as well, which means much of what passes for news.

but this point is only brought up in regard to certain items -- again, as a political weapon. if the leak is supported by the faction one supports -- it's gospel, isn't it?

more here:

The top U.S. military commander in the Middle East signed a secret order last fall that set the stage for increased clandestine and covert operations against militants and other threats across the region, defense officials said Tuesday. Gen. David Petraeus signed an order in September authorizing Special Operations forces to deploy to allied and hostile nations <...>

http://www.alternet.org/rss/breaking_news/199574/petraeus_gave_secret__order_allowing_us_covert_ops_in_n._africa,_across_middle_east/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Thanks for pointing that out.
It's funny how many of these "vast conspiracies" end-up on the net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I guess by that you believe the publication of the Pentagon Papers was some sort of Gov't plot? ???
Or maybe that all secrets are only revealed by the rich and powerful when they want to? And that anything some journalist or whistle blower says is just a PR game they play?

Maybe you are the easily duped one. Maybe your master class is not all powerful and in control of everything. Think about it. That might imply that you should weigh in, in whatever way you can, against them, rather that praising them as omnipotent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joyce78 Donating Member (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. WSWS
World Socialist Web Site. Can anyone provide information?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. take your pick. or try the source quoted by wsws, the new york times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Here's another commentary and link.
http://socialistworker.org/blog/critical-reading/2010/05/25/secret-ops-defend-american-emp

But it also comes from a international socialist website. But that makes sense, because international socialists tend to closely track imperialist habits. Also links to NY Times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. Same basic policies as South America, that was so successful right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. south america, vietnam, indonesia, africa - same old, same old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC