Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Bolton: War, War.....I NEED MORE WAR !!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:04 PM
Original message
John Bolton: War, War.....I NEED MORE WAR !!!



from the WSJ, safe haven for whackjob neocons:



By JOHN BOLTON

Last week, while meandering toward a fourth U.N. Security Council sanctions resolution against Iran, Washington was blindsided by the revival of a previously discarded plan to enrich some of Iran's uranium to higher levels for use in the Tehran research reactor. This proposal—a good deal for Iran when it was proposed last year by the misguided Obama administration—is even better in its latest iteration and does nothing to stop Iran's uranium enrichment program.

The Iranian enrichment deal was brokered by Brazil and Turkey, two of the 10 current nonpermanent Security Council members, and it could pose difficulties for getting the council to adopt another resolution on sanctions. To forestall the debilitating effects of the Brazil-Turkey deal, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton promptly circulated to other council members the draft of a sanctions resolution the five permanent members and Germany had spent months negotiating.

Unfortunately, the damage was done. Turkey announced that negotiations on sanctions should cease for 30 days and Brazil flatly proclaimed it would not even discuss the draft resolution. Since one good turn deserves another, China and Russia will now graciously acknowledge the Brazil-Turkey initiative and insist that the other permanent members enter serious consultations regarding the draft of the permanent five. Thus, having negotiated intensely for months with Russia and China, Mrs. Clinton can look forward to another opportunity to negotiate intensely with both them and their surrogates.

....(snip)....

Here, Iran and North Korea intersect. Cooperation between the two on improving their ballistic missiles has been extensive and Iran likely financed the North Korean reactor that was under construction in Syria until it was destroyed by Israel in September 2007. Nonetheless, China will instinctively oppose even the Security Council discussing tough measures against Pyongyang. It would be a profound mistake if Mr. Obama goes along with this to get Beijing's support for new sanctions against Iran.

Like those of its predecessor, the efforts of the Obama administration to stop Iran's nuclear program have failed. North Korea's nuclear-weapons capability undergirds its belief that it can commit acts of aggression with impunity and therefore shows unambiguously why we must stop Iran. It also shows that the Security Council is gridlocked and impotent. The risks are growing as our president cheers on a world in which unilateral American power is diminished. ..........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704113504575264270768612284.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTTopOpinion



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. You first, white beardo! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Michael Bolton


sociopath nutter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinymontgomery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. I like this line
though it won't be repeated "Like those of its predecessor' huh wasn't HE one of the predecessors (which means he's the loser we all thought he was), and the rest of the losers, bush and his cohorts, they all failed, where is Faux news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why so coy, John?
"Like those of its predecessor, the efforts of the Obama administration to stop Iran's nuclear program have failed." Now, who, who, who, who could possibly have been the "predecessor" to the Obama administration? Such a little mystery, isn't it? My, my, my. Nearly impossible to figure out who that might have been, no? You'd have to remember a-a-a-a-all the way back to last year. And who could be expected to do that? You'd have to be some kind of superhuman remembering, uh, thing to do that!

Oh, and Mr. Bolton? Up yours. Go fight - and finance - your own goddam wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well John, go enlist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlesg Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. "I confess I had no desire to die in a Southeast Asian rice paddy,
I considered the war in Vietnam already lost." - John Bolton, Yale 25th reunion book

i.e. I was too chickenshit to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. John, I confess I wish you had died in a Southeast Asian rice paddy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Me too. Right next to Cheney.
And Rumsfeld. Bushy too. Bunch of chickenhawk cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC