Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why don't we bring back the Independent counsel law?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-07-07 09:15 PM
Original message
Why don't we bring back the Independent counsel law?
June 29, 1999 Web posted at: 6:12 p.m. EDT (2212 GMT)

WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, June 29) -- The independent counsel law, created as part of post-Watergate reforms but a target of increasing criticism over the years, will expire Wednesday.

Before the act was signed into law in 1978 by President Jimmy Carter, the president alone appointed special prosecutors to investigate allegations of wrongdoing against high-ranking government officials. After the so-called Saturday Night Massacre during the Watergate scandal -- where two top government officials resigned rather than carry out President Richard Nixon's demand the special prosecutor Archibald Cox be fired -- Congress was convinced the executive branch could not be trusted to impartially investigate its own.

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/06/29/independent.counsel

I bet there's enough votes to pass this right now.

Let chimpie try to veto this one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-07-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Two words -- Ken Starr, the last independent counsel (persecutor)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-07-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Two words -- George Bush
Funny how the law expired just in time for chimpie to do whatever the hell he wanted.

I'd rather suffer a hundred Ken Stars than 3,300 dead American Soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-07-07 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. The law will have to be crafted carefully so it is not political
and prevent the fiasco that occurred with Rehnquist, Sentelle, Kay. It would also need to require removal of anyone appointed to the panel that is found to be utilizing unethical practices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-07-07 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Vote on it each year: Close, continue, or continue under new lead.
And if new-lead wins the popular vote, the new lead is picked by a 2%+ party that is smaller than the party that picked the last new lead, but certainly a different party. And you can vote for two choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-07-07 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Just in time to go after the next president!
great idea. not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Why not?
It was a dumb move to eliminate that law just in time for a repug to screw us over.

And look where we are now because of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. So it would be smart to put it back in place for the next?
Who is very likely to be a democrat? Do you see a pattern developing here? IP for Democratic regimes, nothing for Republican ones. How about we let the next president have at least a one term breather?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC