Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TAKE ACTION: House Comm Said to Dismiss Clint Curtis/Tom Feeney Election Contest Tuesday Morning!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 03:13 AM
Original message
TAKE ACTION: House Comm Said to Dismiss Clint Curtis/Tom Feeney Election Contest Tuesday Morning!


House Admin Committee Set to Dismiss Clint Curtis/Tom Feeney Election Challenge According to Curtis Campaign

Contest to be Dismissed During Tuesday Mark-up Session of Rush Holt's Election Reform Bill


'Insufficient Evidence' Given as Reason, Despite Failure by Committee to Review 'Hard Evidence' Collected...

===

This came to us too late on Monday to get confirm from Capitol Hill sources, so we're gonna run with what we have for now with that caveat.

The campaign of Clint Curtis (D), the vote-rigging/Tom Feeney whistleblower who challenged Feeney (R-Abramoff) for the U.S. House seat in Florida's 24h Congressional district last November, has told The BRAD BLOG that the U.S. House Administrative Committee is set to dismiss Curtis' Congressional contest of the race --- filed under the Federal Contested Elections Act --- when the committee meets on Tuesday morning.

Though they've yet to examine the "hard evidence" the Curtis campaign says they've collected in the matter, the reason for the dismissal, as given to campaign manager, Marty Ward by a Capitol Hill staffer, was "insufficient evidence". Ward says that two different offices have informed the campaign of the committee's plan to dismiss the case tomorrow.

Ward told us tonight, however, that Congress hasn't even seen, much less investigated, the "hard evidence" in the form of sworn affidavits from voters that the campaign's volunteers have collected over the past several months via door-to-door canvassing in the district. The results of that canvass, the campaign says, reveal that Curtis' votes, as tallied on Florida's paperless touch-screen voting systems, were under-reported by anywhere from 12% to 24% per precinct so far canvassed.

The campaign's reaction to this sudden turn of events, along with House Commitee Contact numbers and email address, which they are asking folks to use prior to Tuesday's morning's meeting, are posted at the link below...

FULL REPORT/ACTION CONTACTS:
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4522

---
Brad Friedman
THE BRAD BLOG - The uprising continues...
http://www.BradBlog.com
VELVET REVOLUTION - The revolution begins...
http://www.VelvetRevolution.us

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mntleo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Done
Wrote this to the committee members:

My name is Cat Sullivan and I am a constituent in the 47th district in Seattle Washington. I am writing to you today to urge you all to consider the investigation into the voting discrepancies happening in Florida especially but also in Louisiana, OH, NH, as well as other places. The very idea you would even consider a bill certifying voting machines is beyond absurd, it is downright frightening. I worked with Andy Stevenson and Bev Harris around these voting machines and as a network administrator familiar with programing and computer hardware, I can tell you, paper ballots and hand counting is by far the most accurate and fair way to ensure every vote counts. In Canada, where ballots are hand counted, they are able to publish accurate returns a few hours after the polls close with every vote counting, why is this so hard to consider?

Also the contested race in Florida has some serious evidence that you really should consider, do not sweep it under the rug. Citizens have signed their names to eye witness accounts, and if you refuse to listen to your own citizens, then whom do you represent? I ask this question in all seriousness because if you refuse to consider sworn testimony, then it is clear to the American people the sacred right vote is not taken seriously enough by you as our sworn representatives who SAID they would uphold the Constitution. I remind you; people have DIED for this right and you have a sworn duty to look into every nook and cranny of this issues, it is your job!

VERY Sincerely Yours,
Catherine L. Sullivan
Address, phone and email included
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. I just talked to John Russell.
He's also part of the challenge in his race vs Ginny Brown-Waite in Florida's 5th district.

He said their attorney still has some moves planned this morning, and they'll know more after about 10:00am this morning. This seems to explain the delay in the state courts, giving them an excuse to throw out the lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Will this hearing be covered by CSPAN? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. House Committee throws out all challenges except Jennings-Buchanan.
Posted on BradBlog.

Motherfuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC