Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Rep. John Conyers: A Trillion Dollar Turning Point?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 02:59 PM
Original message
U.S. Rep. John Conyers: A Trillion Dollar Turning Point?
Edited on Sun May-30-10 03:02 PM by marmar
from huffpost:



Rep. John Conyers
Chairman, House Judiciary Committee

Posted: May 29, 2010 01:24 PM


A Trillion Dollar Turning Point?



As of 10:06 a.m., Sunday, May 30th, the United States will have spent $1 trillion on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

As we approach this milestone, Americans of all political stripes should take a moment to consider what war spending on this scale means, not just in dollars spent, but in terms of opportunities lost to strengthen, invest in, and improve our country. While each of us intrinsically knows that wars have consequences, we are rarely presented with such a stark example of how the choice to pursue war at the expense of priorities at home impacts each of us.

What could we have purchased with this $1 trillion? Today, we might be enjoying the fruits of a green economy, spurred by New Deal-like investments in wind and solar. Perhaps we would have created a single-payer health care system and used this $1 trillion to provide health security to every man, woman, and child in the United States for an entire year. Or, we might have made the smart investments in our domestic law enforcement capabilities and homeland security apparatus to provide true protection from Al Qaeda and others who would wish us harm. Sadly, we'll never know, because our political leadership never explored alternative means of achieving peace, such as emphasizing rigorous regional diplomacy, and instead overextended our military forces abroad.

If sacrificing progress at home wasn't bad enough, it is now clear that the injection of our troops into a 35 year civil war is actually fueling the insurgency in Afghanistan and further destabilizing the region. A GAO report released last month spoke to the deteriorating security situation in Afghanistan, noting:

"total attacks against coalition forces between September 2009 and March 2010 increased by about 83 percent in comparison to the same period last year, while attacks against civilians rose by about 72 percent."


As we gather to honor our brave men and women in uniform at at parades, picnics, and other events this weekend, Americans have much to consider. We can ignore the facts on the ground, hope for the best, and resign ourselves to the fact that our country is embroiled in two unaffordable wars that aren't making us safer.

Or, we can stand up and speak out. We can let our family members, friends, and neighbors know about the human and fiscal costs of these wars. We can demand that the United States honor its commitment to leave Iraq by December 31, 2011, encourage Members of Congress to join the Out of Afghanistan Caucus, and organize against the $33 billion pending in Congress to fund the escalation, because $1 trillion is more than enough to spend on war.

During my 44 years in Congress, I have personally witnessed the transformational change that is possible when the American people resolve to take back their democracy. As my friend and mentor, the late Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., stated, "Those of us who love peace must organize as effectively as war hawks. As they spread the propaganda of war, we must spread the propaganda of peace." This Sunday, I hope that my fellow citizens will heed Dr. King's advice and ensure that this May 30th isn't remembered only as the day America crossed the $1 trillion threshold, but also as the day Americans took a united stand against more war.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-conyers/a-trillion-dollar-turning_b_594443.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Write another sternly worded letter....or.....
DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!

Shit or get off the pot Conyers, stop telling me what we COULD do with the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike K Donating Member (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You've got Conyers' number.
Anyone who is at all familiar with the effects of heroin use will agree that Conyers' manifests the speech characteristic of a nodding smack junkie. But if that isn't his problem then he clearly has some form of brain damage that produces the same somnolent symptom.

Conyers has always been a very effective representative for his Detroit district, especially in the area of civil rights issues, which accounts for his being re-elected ten times. His service to that specific region is what keeps him in office. But as Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee he is absolutely useless.

Apart from vigorously addressing the occasional civil rights issue, I am not aware of anything constructive Conyers has ever done. He does nothing but run his mouth, usually in a manner which is at best an ineffective embarrassment. When his Committee saw fit to hold "hearings" re: certain actions of the Bush Administration I watched two BushCo lawyers, Addington and Yoo, respond to Conyers with intentionally visible contempt and I must say I couldn't blame them. His questions were at best inane and he looked and sounded exactly like a heroin junkie who was about to nod out. I fully expected his head to slowly drop to the table as he rambled on nonsensically.

Conyers' chairmanship of that committee is blatant evidence of the corrupt machinations in the House and within the Democratic Party. And I understand that John Conyers and Nancy ("Impeachment is off the table!") Pelosi are closely aligned. Those two are quite the pair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. painfully true Howard Zinn quote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC