Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Instead of reform we pay $147 million a year to Brazil so that we can pay $3 billion to agribusiness

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:20 AM
Original message
Instead of reform we pay $147 million a year to Brazil so that we can pay $3 billion to agribusiness
Brazil's victory in cotton trade case exposes America's wasteful subsidies

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/02/AR2010060204228.html

AMERICAN taxpayers owe Brazil and its cotton farmers a thank-you. That may sound odd, given that the Obama administration recently agreed to pay the Brazilians $147.3 million a year to settle their international trade case against U.S. cotton subsidies. Indeed, the net effect of the payoff is to enable Washington to continue supporting American cotton farmers to the tune of about $3 billion per year. So what's to be thankful for? Brazil's case laid bare the truth about the U.S. cotton program: Not only is it a wasteful sop to special interests, but it's also an obstacle to free and fair trade that needlessly complicates U.S. relations with the rest of the world. Reform -- or, better, repeal -- is long overdue.

The federal government has spent more than $50 billion propping up cotton growers since 1991, with subsidies averaging more than $3 billion per year over the past decade. Most of this aid supports large, politically connected agribusinesses in the Sun Belt -- although the Arkansas Department of Corrections' operation, manned by convicts, has also received some of the cash. Thanks partly to the subsidies, U.S. producers can outcompete lower-cost producers on the world market; American farms account for about 40 percent of global exports. In 2002, Brazil complained to the World Trade Organization about this, arguing that the U.S. programs violated international free-trade agreements that the United States itself had championed. It took a while, but the WTO has agreed, authorizing Brazil to retaliate by levying tariffs against other American products. Brazil's threat to use that authority against U.S. goods, from wheat to software, forced the Obama administration to buy a truce last month.

In short, the U.S. cotton industry's dependence on subsidies that violate international trade agreements turned it from a mere waste of taxpayer money into a threat to other American exporters and the jobs they support. As four House members, Democrats Ron Kind (Wis.) and Barney Frank (Mass.) and Republicans Jeff Flake (Ariz.) and Paul D. Ryan (Wis.), put it in a recent letter to the president, the cotton program is "quickly becoming a liability for future trade growth. Instead of effectively reforming our programs, we are electing to pay $147.3 million annually to Brazilian agribusiness so that we can continue to pay around $3 billion a year to large U.S. agribusiness." Of course, the federal government must borrow much of the $147.3 million and the $3 billion. If this sorry episode doesn't shame Washington into ending this fiasco, nothing will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SocialistLez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Happily recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. shame Washington?
Those Bastard have no shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Rec for exposure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Waste not, want not?
Did nobody in the Federal government ever learn that?

I wish I could say I was surprised by the information. At least I found out one new fact - Arkansas has reinvented good old-fashioned cotton-field slavery in the 21st century. Sigh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC