Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California judge rules that GOP candidate Chuck DeVore "unlawfully adapted" two Don Henley songs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 01:20 PM
Original message
California judge rules that GOP candidate Chuck DeVore "unlawfully adapted" two Don Henley songs


Republican Slapped for Stealing Don Henley's Songs
California judge rules Chuck DeVore's adaptation of two tracks was not protected as parody

By Daniel Kreps
Jun 02, 2010 9:56 AM EDT

In a ruling that could prevent politicians from turning classic rock standards into campaign trail songs, a California judge ruled yesterday that a pair of Don Henley tracks — "All She Wants to Do is Dance" and "The Boys of Summer" — were unlawfully adapted by California Republican senatorial candidate Chuck DeVore, who wrote and recorded altered versions without permission for a pair of YouTube campaign videos, The Hollywood Reporter's Esq. blog reports. While many rockers have taken Republicans to trial over non-approved use of their music, most notably Jackson Browne who won a legal victory over John McCain, this marks the first case where a rock great took a politician to court over a parody.

According to the judge's decision, Henley first took issue with one of the ads — the "Boys of Summer" knock-off "Hope of November," which ragged on President Barack Obama and Hollywood's liberalism — in April 2009, asking that YouTube remove the videos. In response, DeVore not only demanded that YouTube restore the ad, he further stirred the pot by turning Henley's "All She Wants to Do is Dance" into "All She Wants to Do is Tax," once again without the approval of Henley, who supported Obama during the 2008 Presidential election. In the resulting lawsuit, Henley claimed DeVore infringed upon his copyrights by lampooning his songs, while DeVore countered his versions were parodies of the original versions and constitutionally protected.

The judge saw it differently. After parsing the differences between "parody" and "satire," U.S. District Court Judge James Selna wrote that DeVore's versions of Henley's songs failed to mock the song and songwriter itself — which would have been allowable as parody. "DeVore argues that "Hope of November" parodies the original by using its themes of nostalgia and disillusionment to mock Henley and other Obama supporters who, in 'November,' look back wistfully at Obama's campaign and bemoan his failure to deliver on the promised 'hope,' " Selna wrote. "This, however, does not comment on or criticize the content of 'Boys of Summer.' Rather, 'November' uses those themes and devices to mock a separate subject entirely, namely Obama and his supporters."

Citing a handful of examples ranging from J.D. Salinger's lawsuit against a Catcher in the Rye sequel written by another author to Tom Waits' action against Frito Lay, Selna ultimately ruled that DeVore's mock versions of Henley's songs exceeded the rights of fair use and that, ultimately, the copyrights of "Boys of Summer" and "All She Wants to Do is Dance" were infringed upon. The case is similar to Joe Walsh's lawsuit against an Illinois Republican congressional candidate also named Joe Walsh, who turned the James Gang hit "Walk Away" into the campaign video "Lead the Way" without permission.

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/17386/104520
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Happy to K&R for Don Henley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've got mixed feelings about this
It seems like a good thing if liberal songwriters can keep from having their music ripped off by GOP candidates, but I suspect that this particular decision offers a slippery slope.

For example, there have been plenty of liberal parodies of familiar materials used to taunt Republicans -- such as the Campari beverage ad parody that Jerry Falwell sued Hustler and Larry Flynt over. Or any number of parodies of the Master Card "priceless" ads.

I think those are different from altering somebody's song for political purposes -- in part because they involve making fun of the original, even when that's not the main target. But there's a fine line being drawn here, and I'm not sure I trust the judiciary to observe it in a way that doesn't come down on the side of censorship.

My own inclination would be to say that using a song in its original form is copyright infringement, but that writing new lyrics to mock a particular point of view associated with the original -- even if somewhat indirectly -- is not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heywood J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. There are differences there.
MasterCard *might* have a case, but it wasn't Campari that sued Hustler. Falwell was the object of the parody, it's legal to parody him. The case in the OP would be the equivalent of Campari suing for using substantial portions of its text or photos.

Parody and satire have two different targets, making them different things. One's legal to use material for, the other isn't. It's a reasonably clear distinction - you can only claim fair use if you're parodying the thing you're copying, not using it to parody something else. Keep in mind that the song's music/melody is also copyrighted, not just the lyrics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC