|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-07-10 08:27 PM Original message |
Police department accidently lets website domain expire, speed camera foe snatches it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelgb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-07-10 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. sweet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtuck004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-07-10 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. LOL Bet they wish they'd spent that $27 on the web site n.t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-07-10 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
3. For the most part those traffic cameras and their tickets are not about traffic safety. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jp11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-07-10 09:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. It is more the municipality that wants the revenue that is why they often will contract the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-07-10 09:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. No matter either the city or the police. It's still about money. Not public safety. Money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevenmarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-08-10 03:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
21. It's never about public safety, after they put one in across from my office we would hear our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-07-10 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. We have a few of these here in Denver. Some temporary, some permanent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-07-10 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
5. Deleted message |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-07-10 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. i am personally in favor of making assholes who run red lights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rbixby (716 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-07-10 10:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. The only problem is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-08-10 09:26 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. first of all, ours clearly capture the face of the driver, and secondly you are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rbixby (716 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-08-10 10:11 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. That's not how the Minnesota supreme court saw it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-08-10 01:29 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. cars are different, as are many other things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-08-10 10:01 AM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Correction* In Chicago they deploy those cameras based on where the highest revenue will be made.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-08-10 01:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. you are free to be cynical, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-08-10 01:36 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. ..unless you shorten the yellow light time and INCREASE the number of rear-end accidents to boot.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-08-10 03:02 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. clearly addressed in my first post np |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Incitatus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-07-10 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
7. Yeah, that's that the automatic renewal functon is for. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-08-10 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
12. Governments shouldn't have .com domains |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heywood J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-08-10 10:00 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-08-10 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
16. K/R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:45 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC