Too bad the OP hit piece didn't didn't contextualize what was being said.
But the activists who participated in the first three hours of the conference found that they were essentially in one camp, the mood of which was captured in words like those of Arianna Huffington, who said, "Hope is not enough ... We need a 'Hope 2.0'" that depends not on what President Obama or other politicians say or do but on what we as progressives do.
Wow ! what a novel concept....progressive actually getting off their asses and doing something other than spreading rightwing media spin. :evilfrown:
"It is not our job to make this president and this administration comfortable," Burner said, representing those more eager to challenge Obama. "It is to make this president and the administration do the right thing, even when it is uncomfortable."
Hmmm, "those more EAGER to challenge Obama." seems to indicate not all took that position. BTW, I consider Darcy a friend and a true progressive who will not appreciate the tone and deception of the headline.
Bhargava, himself a critic of Obama's stances on immigration and jobs policy, nonetheless offered positive words for an administration that he said "achieved much more in the last 18 months than progressives give ourselves credit for."
But Bhargava said that progressives can be faulted for not having a mass movement on the left that matches pound for pound the fervor of the "tea party" movement on the right and its ability to capture the attention of the mass media and the general public.
My my,,,,,
Burner said that based on what she has seen on Capitol Hill, "we are not advocating for our side in the way that the right is advocating for theirs." In many congressional offices "there are 10 Tea Party calls for every one of ours."
And that level of intensity changes the perception of that the political limits are, both agreed. Obama's natural inclination is to be a consensus builder, Burner said, but progressives have to ask themselves, "What choices are we giving him for building consensus?"
Wow...hard to understand the "consensus" implication of the headline or the placement (LBN) of this hit piece. :shrug: