Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scientists challenge BP containment claims

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 02:29 PM
Original message
Scientists challenge BP containment claims
Cast doubt on statement that device could capture 'vast majority' of oil
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37573643/ns/disaster_in_the_gulf/

Some scientists are taking issue with BP's statement that a containment cap placed over a gushing well could be capturing "the vast majority" of oil spewing into the Gulf of Mexico.

They suggest it's misleading, if not irresponsible, to make such a statement when the company has acknowledged it doesn't know how much oil is flowing from the busted well, or how much the spill rate has increased since engineers cut a riser pipe so it could properly fit the containment cap.

"I don’t see that as being a credible claim," said Steve Wereley, associate professor of mechanical engineering at Purdue University and a member of the Flow Rate Technical Group, a national panel of scientists and engineers tasked with determining the spill size.

"What I would say to BP is, show the American public the before and after shots of the evidence on which they’re basing that claim," Werely told msnbc.com on Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. B.P. spokes man seems to be the spokesman for B.S. glad scientist are raising
concerns about credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who are you gonna believe? A bunch of eggheads or BP?
It is interesting that in one breath, BP can say it has no idea how much oil is spewing out of their well, and in the very next breath claim that they're capturing a vast majority of that very same spew.

The crucial point is that BP has a very real interest in minimizing the amount of the underwater gusher, because they could be on the hook for a penalty of as much as $4,300 per barrel. One estimate has the spew gushing forth at 100,000 barrels per day, which results in a maximum fine of about $21.5 billion* so far with no end in sight. BP has no interest in getting an accurate measure, because the estimate will almost surely be low (if an official estimate is made that is over and above the actual flow, you damn betcha BP will suddenly "discover" a method for getting an accurate measure, right down to the last barrel).

*And has been said, a billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC