Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sarah Palin Demands Hardball Regulations and a Takeover of BP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 06:08 PM
Original message
Sarah Palin Demands Hardball Regulations and a Takeover of BP
Here's the centerpiece of what she wrote:

Unless government appropriately regulates oil developments and holds oil executives accountable, the public will not trust them to drill, baby, drill. And we must!

I can only assume she was suggesting that "we must!" regulate and drill. For the record, we're already drilling offshore, so enough of this hackish "drill, baby, drill" screeching. There are already 3,858 oil and gas platforms operating in the Gulf of Mexico alone, according to NOAA. Here's a convenient map with yellow dots indicating all of the locations where we're already, you know, drilling, baby, drilling:



Sarah wrote that she supports "playing hardball with Big Oil" and praised her former "administration's efforts in holding Big Oil accountable to operate ethically and responsibly." So let's hear it then. I want to know specifically what Sarah Palin supports in terms of new regulations.

In her Facebook entry, she demanded:

Mr. President: with all due respect, you have to get involved, sir. The priorities and timeline of an oil company are not the same as the public's. You cannot outsource the cleanup and the responsibility and the trust to BP and expect that the legitimate interests of Americans adversely affected by this spill will somehow be met.

In this paragraph, she makes it abundantly clear that she supports government intervention in the free market.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/sarah-palin-demands-hardb_b_606774.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaJoe Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lady Blah Blah strikes again! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey, we agree on something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. I haven't read the whole article yet...
but this is the most coherent thing I've ever heard her say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It is a great article
Ms. Palin also advised the president to meet with people from Alaska's Department of Natural Resources, and added with a flourish, "Or, what the heck, give me a call."


In the incredibly unlikely event that Mr. Obama did give Ms. Palin a call, the conversation wouldn't impact the Gulf spill outcome any more than if Mr. Obama talked to beleaguered Tony Hayward, who just wants to get his life back, as Ms. Palin did when she resigned from her job as governor of the big oil state Alaska.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20007194-503544.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. and yet it is still pretty bizarre and incoherent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I wonder who wrote it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sarah, welcome to my Socialist world!!!!
The only free market Palin cares about is the marketing of her own brand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. I understand the impulse to nationalize British Petroleum
but the last time someone tried that, the CIA overthrew the local democratically elected government (and look how well that turned out in the long run). Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. She can go fuck herself. It isn't like there's any reason to take her advice seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomThom Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. someone must of sent her the wrong talking points
that's not a republican position
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC