Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Isn't this bigger news??? Chevron admits violating Oil-for-Food when Condi on BoD.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 11:38 AM
Original message
Why Isn't this bigger news??? Chevron admits violating Oil-for-Food when Condi on BoD.
Via "Mugsy's Rap Sheet":

Chevron Admits to Violating “Oil-for-Food” Program While Condi on BoD.

EXCUSE ME, but why in the hell isn't this a bigger story???

I only just heard about this this morning. Apparently, Chevron has confessed that they were violating the "Oil-for-Food" program (to deprive Saddam of money he could use to buy weapons) in 2000 while Condi Rice was on their Board of Directors.

Now excuse me, but the Bush Administration made a BIG DEAL about how Saddam violating the "Oil-for-Food" program was "a violation of U.N. sanctions that demanded a military response".

The Bush White House frequently pointed to Saddam violating the "Oil-for-Food" program when making the case for war, and afterwards using the fact to defend the decision to go to war when no WMD's were found (all links on whitehouse.gov official website):

o "Saddam Hussein has illegally imported hundreds of millions of dollars in goods in violation of economic sanctions and outside of the UN's Oil-for-Food program. For example, Iraq has imported fiber optic communications systems that support the Iraqi military."

- Item #1: "Saddam Hussein's Efforts to Circumvent Economic Sanctions", April 29, 2003

(...)

o "President Discusses Growing Danger posed by Saddam Hussein's Regime":

"Saddam Hussein's regime continues to support terrorist groups and to oppress its civilian population. It refuses to account for missing Gulf War personnel, or to end illicit trade outside the U.N.'s oil-for-food program. And although the regime agreed in 1991 to destroy and stop developing all weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles, it has broken every aspect of this fundamental pledge." - Sept 14, 2002

And Rice herself on the subject in an interview with Al-Jazeera:

o "Now, we understood when we came to power here in Washington several months ago that we had a problem, for instance, on Iraqi sanctions; that people believed, or that Saddam Hussein was claiming that the sanctions that were in place were somehow harming the Iraqi people. We do not believe that they were harming the Iraqi people because in the north, where the U.N. administers the oil-for-food program, Iraqi people are doing well. It's only where Saddam Hussein administers oil-for-food that there is a problem with the Iraqi people." - October 16, 2001 (barely a month after 9/11)

Couple this with Halliburton illegally doing business with Iran while Cheney was their CEO, and this should be a MUCH bigger scandal. Yet, not even the top sites on the Left seem to be giving it much play.


(more on "Mugsy's Rap Sheet")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Golly, I guess the gummint controls the media. Just like those commies controlled theirs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. zzzzzzzzzzzzzz wake me up when the corruption stops zzzzzzzzzzzzz
we are SO overwhelmed with the sleazy sorruption of this gang o' thugs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because Paris Hilton's Jail Sentence
Is so much more important to the public.;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R this!
At the very least we can ensure curious types who visit here will see it, in spite of Bush**'s fascist media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I'm spreading the word...
...as best I can, but it seems to be an uphill battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Because, they can do whatever they want as long as they are friends
to this adminsistration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wasn't Halliburton doing business with Iraq
while Cheney was in charge, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You forgot Iran! Despite sanctions imposed against doing business with Iran since 1995,
Halliburton did business with Iran while Cheney was running the company. The sanctions were circumvented by simply running it out of an office placed in the Cayman Islands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It's in the full text.
I didn't forget Iran, it's just not included in this excerpt. :)
It's in the full story if you follow the link.

Thanks for all the votes. Let's try to get this on the front page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. It should be. Recommended #3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. but it was just business- there was PROFIT invovled...
some of you just don't get it, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC