Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraqi Union Set to Strike over Oil Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 12:09 PM
Original message
Iraqi Union Set to Strike over Oil Law
snip>>

http://priceofoil.org/2007/05/09/iraqi-union-set-to-strike-over-oil-law/

"Iraq’s largest oil workers’ trade union will strike tomorrow, in protest at the controversial oil law currently being considered by the Iraqi parliament. The move threatens to stop all oil exports from Iraq.

The oil law proposes giving multinational companies the primary role in developing Iraq’s huge untapped oilfields, under contracts lasting up to 30 years. Oil production in Iraq, like in most of the Middle East, has been in the public sector since the 1970s.

The Union, representing 26,000 oil workers, has held three previous
strikes since 2003, each time stopping exports, for up to two days at a
time. The announcement of the strike has spurred negotiations with the
Ministry of Oil, which are ongoing.

Imad Abdul-Hussain, Federation Deputy Chair of the IFOU said: “The
central government must be in total ownership and complete control of
production and the export of oil”. He warned against the controversial
Production Sharing Agreements favored by foreign companies, saying
other forms of co-operation with foreign companies would be acceptable
but not at the level of control and profiteering indicated in the
current Oil Law."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, this news won't make the Neocons happy.
Look for increased violence, and an unusually high death toll among this group of "terrorists."

No doubt Cheney and Rove are working on it right now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why do you think Cheney went to Iraq? To put pressure on the Iraqis to pass that damn OIL law !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I hope they tell him STFU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, at this point their actions are pretty transparent.
Have the Queen over for dinner: See? We're legitimate, other countries recognize us as being in charge!

Go to see the damage in Kansas: See? We care, Bush is workin' hard for the Murkin people.

Cheney to Iraq: See? It's safe. Even Big Dick can go there in complete safety...

None of those things have anything at all to do with photo ops for the masses.

Nope.

Not a bit of that. With all the death, destruction, and problems in the world, it would be inappropriate for the President and his administration to do such foolish and irresponsible things, right?

Right?




Right?





Why isn't anyone disagreeing with me? :shrug:

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. or the Democrats
the Oil Law is one of their benchmarks....

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/kucinich-seeks-to-strip-o_b_43398.html

<snip>


But Representative Dennis Kucinich is asking for something to be removed from the supplemental - the "benchmark" that requires the Iraqi government to pass a new oil law.

As Antonia Juhasz pointed out in an op-ed yesterday in the New York Times, the Bush Administration has touted the positive aspect of the draft Iraq oil law currently before Iraq's parliament: that it seeks to share oil revenues fairly among Iraq's regions and ethnic groups.

But until recently there has been very little discussion in the U.S. of what the draft oil law means for the relationship of foreign companies to Iraq's oil reserves. Critics, including Iraqi labor unions, charge that the law will privatize Iraq's oil reserves into the hands of multinational oil companies.

In a letter to fellow Members of Congress, Representative Kucinich writes:

The primary function of the oil law currently being considered by the Iraqi government will be to open Iraqi oil fields to private foreign companies, depriving the Iraqi people of a necessary source of national income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. But why are the Democrats in favor of the benchmark in the
Iraq Supplemental Bill? I've called my reps and the leadership offices as well for an explanation but none has been forthcoming?

Kucinich Statement on the Iraq Supplemental Conference Report HR 1591

http://kucinich.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=63687


"Washington, Apr 25 - WASHINGTON, DC — Following passage of the supplemental conference report this evening, Congressman Dennis Kucinich released the following statement:

This “Supplemental” is a plan to extort Iraq’s oil wealth under the guise of a plan to end the war. Funds for the security of the Iraqi government are contingent upon Iraq giving up control of oil. This legislation is a repugnant, high pressure tactic to force Iraq to pass a “hydrocarbon act” which will effectively privatize the oil wealth of Iraq. The key deception is that the hydrocarbon act, which sounds like an environmental law, lets Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds “share” whatever is left after US oil companies take unconscionable profits. This bill is not a plan for peace. It is blood for oil. It is a guarantee of more war and the continued U.S. occupation of Iraq."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. H.R.1591 SUMMARY AS OF: 3/29/2007--Passed Senate
amended.

"(Sec. 1710) Withholds, with specified exceptions, 50% of certain economic and narcotics law enforcement funds under this Act for Iraq until the President certifies to the Senate Committees on Appropriations and Foreign Relations and the House Committees on Appropriations and Foreign Affairs that the government of Iraq has: (1) enacted a hydrocarbon law that equitably shares oil revenues among all Iraqis;"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. kick
for the workers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good for them.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC