Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lincoln's win points to power of black voters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 10:51 AM
Original message
Lincoln's win points to power of black voters
thought this was interesting

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37613079/ns/politics-washington_post/

For all the millions that both sides spent on the bruising Arkansas Senate Democratic primary race, Yvonne Thomas admits she went to the polls not having much of a sense about the candidates.

What she did know, and what turned out to be the only thing that mattered in her decision to cast her ballot for the embattled incumbent Blanche Lincoln, was this: "Obama wanted us to vote for her," said Thomas, who is African American.

Unlike in much of the South, in Arkansas it is a rare thing for the black vote to be the decisive factor in elections. African Americans here account for 16 percent of the population -- about half their percentage in Georgia to the east. Arkansas is the only state from the Confederacy that has never elected a black candidate to Congress, or to any statewide office, since Reconstruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Just so's you know
Blanche Lincoln Democrats may well be the problem in your county, but that isn't true everywhere. Some places the Democrats are so far left that they're almost right. In fact, in my county, DeFazio quite often plays to the two extremes because they're against the same things but for different reasons. My local Dem Club is so far left that I don't even go anymore because their causes are pure wastes of time. I'm just saying, it's awesome that you are tackling some of the entrenched thinking in your area, but it's not that way everywhere. Obama is being much more supportive of Barbara Boxer than he was of Blanche Lincoln, he supports party incumbents regardless of what kind of Dem they are. He's not your problem, your local conservatism is your problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. I thought Obama stayed out of it?
I know Bill Clinton showed up to back her. Was Obama in her ads on TV? I saw her ads on TV, but nothing Obama. I'd like to see it. I'm here in Arkansas.

When I was reading through nearly 500 comments from salon.com about Lincoln one guy said he actually knew 7 African Americans that changed their votes because of Obama. :( They trusted Obama. Some voted for Lincoln due to Bill Clinton. They did not know they were voting against their best interests. :(

Someone said:

"If The Whitehouse couldn't have Lincoln, they'd rather have a republican" They did not want Bill Halter or any progressives there. This bothers me. All I understand is they want status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. So why are they supporting Barbara Boxer?
I don't know where people get this shit. The White House is supporting the best opportunities for a Dem Majority. PERIOD. They support legislation that is as liberal as possible AND can get passed. That's how governing is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Barbara Boxer is one of the best senators
Lincoln is different. Oh, well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. And Obama has gone out to California
and done fundraisers for her. If he doesn't want progressives in the Senate, according to your post, why is he going so far out of his way to help Boxer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. So?
This is not the point! I still like and admire Obama, would vote for him again. I am on Boxer's email list and am one of her supporters. The point here is lots of people think the White House would rather to have a republican than to have a progressive democrat like Bill Halter if they couldn't have Lincoln. It doesn't matter what I think. I was just wondering if this was true.

'kay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Again, why would he campaign for Boxer
If he doesn't want progressives?

You know, facts + reason = opinion. Wanna try??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Apples and Oranges
Blanche Lincoln is a DINO, corporatist, a republican dressed as a democrat running against a progressive Democrat, Bill Halter. Both Bill Clinton and Obama had no business standing behind her, should have left it to the people of Arkansas to decide. Working families, union members, progressives, senior citizens, SEIU, people who want the public option, environmentalists, etc. wanted Lincoln out. Bill Halter had a chance to beat Boozman, a Republican in November.


Barbara Boxer, a Democrat will be running against a REPUBLICAN Carly Fiorina so Obama is standing behind her...not because she's a progressive democrat, but because she's a DEMOCRAT running against REPUBLICAN.

Try again

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Boxer had a primary
Mickey Kaus ran against her, now that would have been a great New Democrat candidate if that's all the Obama White House cared about.

They support the incumbent because that is what is expected if there is going to be any hope for party loyalty on the toughest votes. It's how health care reform got to the floor, whether you like the bill itself or not. That's the way it works.

It's beyond stupid, way beyond stupid, that Obama doesn't want any progressives in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I stand corrected
Ok, Barbara did have a primary.

I am not replying again after this because all you want to do is to insult. Lighten up!

Have a nice day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Your logic does not compute.
Halter would have had a better chance in the general, this Halter was the better opportunity for a Dem majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why do you think she won? AR uses the same voting machine that SC does.
We have a purely faith-based election system, but to make statements like you're making you must be pretty sure black voters voted for Lincoln. Do you know something I don't know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC