Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

National Guardsmen Censor CNN Cameraman Trying To Film Oil Soaked Birds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 01:48 PM
Original message
National Guardsmen Censor CNN Cameraman Trying To Film Oil Soaked Birds
"Ma'am? I'm gonna have to ask you to stop taking pictures here."

Video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3HHSxc_rPI&feature=player_embedded

What bullshit is this? What COUNTRY is this? So, first the Coast Guard, and now the National Guard is answering to BP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Corporations rule the world. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. i thought Thad Allen was supposed to put a stop this...doncha love lip service!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. President Hayward wouldn't hear of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Jindal has jurisdiction over the National Guard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. as "National Incident Commander" Thad Allen's jurisdiction supersedes Jindal's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. No, not on the National Guard. Also,
the culprit was a Louisiana state official.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. then, the national incident commander needs to realign these guys with the stated operating strategy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
63. You certainly earn your "apologist" reputation
Keep cashing those DLC checks.

:puke:

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. ...
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't overdo it. The birds are stressed and we already know what they look like
I don't think in this particular case it's a big conspiracy. This is what is advised for the oiled birds by the people trying to care for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The camerawoman was filming the outside of the frigging tent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Most will probably die. It's another unfavorable report regarding access.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. They just reported that fact on CNN now - if it's not oiled feathers it's toxicity of food nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. "This is what is advised for the oiled birds by the people trying to care for them." Source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Watch CNN they said it themselves with various anchors nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. They are already stressed
filming a quick piece outside the yellow line will not add any more stress. It is bologna.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. I'm not so sure about that, Mojorabbit. My wife is a wildlife rehabilitator
and she says one of the worst stressors for any wild animal--bird or mammal--is proximity to humans. Movement, voices, lights, etc. are really bad for them when they are unable to escape. The clinic she works in has a policy of no visitors and no talking because of the stress on the injured critters.

The fact that they are already stressed does not mean that it is okay to add more stress.

Just my opinion, but I feel sure it's based in fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #38
62. I am a wildlife rehabber too
and I do rabbits and armadillos as a specialty. Rabbits are notoriously prone to stress. I have done them for over a decade as a specialty and I speak to them in a low calm voice all the time. They pick up on stress around them, if you are calm then they are calm.
The photographers were behind yellow tape. A quick photo or video without flash from that distance wouldn't have added added any more stress. JMO
I have my own reasons for wondering about the lack of transparency right now and I am not the only rehabber that feels this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. Just as you, I have major concerns with the lack of transparency in
this whole horrific mess. And I certainly understand why you are suspicious. I was just trying to point out something that others may not be aware of.

Off topic, today we picked up one bunny--the sole survivor from a nest of four--that my wife thought was going to expire on the way home. She started working on it and now it's snuggling with another bunny with a broken leg. I am always amazed at the way she can keep those little buggers alive long enough to release. She also has three little ones that haven't opened their eyes yet.

Thanks for your work as a rehabber. I don't know about where you are, but around here the influx of injured critters is off the charts. And donations for medicine and other important expenses like vet care are way down.

My wife's sister is also a rehabber who does raccoons. She lives right on the Gulf in Mississippi. We are waiting to hear more from her about how the oil is affecting them. She was scheduled to go to a seminar for animal rescuers to train on how to deal with the oiled critters, but we have not gotten a report on that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. I am in Florida
I have 16 rabbits, (cottontail and marsh) and four armadillos just now and that is after a big release. Most of the buns are orphans though I have an adult cottontail with a nasty abscess and one very degloved juvie marsh from a lawn mower accident. It has been an extraordinarily busy year here too.

I took the BP hazmat internet course
but the 24 hour class is not being offered here yet and I am on the list to be called to help clean. I am hearing some things through back channels that make me a bit uncomfortable though about how this is being managed. I would feel a lot better about the whole thing if there was more transparency.
Hope those buns do well! They are nosy little things and I really adore them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. unless the national guard was actually protecting the birds
waiting for help to arrive for them, or picking them up to take them to Tri-State or International, then they weren't helping the birds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #20
42. Obama needs to officially announce the federal policy on press access
to the area. It is a big public relations mistake to say that access will be permitted and then have guards who block access.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
44. Blocking the free flow of information always screws us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Government takes its orders from Corporations.
BP is in charge of this operation, and for some reason, government assets are such Coast Guard and National Guard are acting as agents of BP.

It's appalling, and our president has explaining to do about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I'll hold my breath
"It's appalling, and our president has explaining to do about it."

When this happens send a pm to 'blueboy'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. We live in a police state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. This pic seems to fit:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's interesting how they say "we can't say who we work for" then say "BP didn't tell me that"
In response to being told that BP had lifted the gag order.

It's so transparent yet they and gov folks continue to deny there is a coverup going on and censorship of the peoples right to be informed.

Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
56. Thinking these very same things and making the same observation. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jotsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Welcome to DU
Your community has been on my mind nearly every day for five years. Tears have replaced the thoughts. I'm so sorry you get to be the front runner of impact yet again. After the hurricane, it was about not losing the character of a town I view as culturally and historically significant, which had been a battle in its own right. Now I just feel an open ended mourning that I can't deny or contain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #59
69. Thank you
Thank you for the welcome, but more so, thank you for caring and understanding with appreciation the oddity and uniqueness that is this funky place.
Thank you most of all though for your attention in helping make those responsible accountable, and by doing so, to help your fellow citizens out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. Good to know what side the government is on.
K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. Who have approved of this in congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. Or what?? You going to shoot me??
Did Obama declare marshal law???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. It's martial law, and it seems BP has declared it.
I guess our country has been taken over by a foreign corporatation.

Oh well. :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cresent City Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. I was naive, but I'm coming around
From the very beginning, I could see BP's effort to limit damage to its reputation was more important to them than limiting the physical damage of the spill. The use of dispersants, the low estimates of flow, and denial of undersea plumes are just three things pointing in this direction.

I took the position that the government response was well meaning, but slow, and ineffective. It is looking more and more like the government is engaged in the same type of damage control as BP, worrying more about the perception of the response than the response itself.

Unless someone taking pictures or scientists gathering samples are actually hampering legitiamate clean up efforts, these should be allowed and encouraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. They let them in to film and just showed images on CNN
Not a great time to jump to conclusions. It's enough that CNN uses it to promote their broadcast and look like they are "on the side of the people".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
27. If CNN can't go up the chain of command and find out who the boss of these security guards are,
they need to go down the chain to find out who isn't passing the message on, someone up the chain should know who's hiring those guards.

Thanks for the thread, Bluebear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
28. IMPORTANT:
I saw this explanation today:

"The operations cannot be photographed or observed by outsiders, because they are part of a massive body of evidence outlining the harm that the spill has caused wildlife, in violation of federal laws such as the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act and Endangered Species Act."

http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/06/when_animal_rescues_fall_short.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. ?
Very strange sentence. Raises more suspicions than it allays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. They're part of the evidence, but the evidence can't be proved or quantified by independent sources?
I mean, it's one thing in a criminal case where crime scenes have to be protected to find the culprit based on what they know of the crime scene, but we know who the culprits are in this case. The evidence convicting them should be wholly public, and independently verified by environmental NGOs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. I think it will be, eventually.
There's a lot of information in that article. Here's another quote:

"It is not so much the number of dead creatures as how they died that matters to the government, although obviously the more the harm, the higher the possible penalty," said University of Michigan Law School professor David Uhlmann, who worked for seven years as chief of the environmental crimes section at the federal Department of Justice. Uhlmann said the government likely will bring charges under the Clean Water Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, both of which were used after the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. That's not the same as what I'm advocating.
The guy being quoted from U of MI a former DOJ chief. He is saying the government will likely bring charges under the CWA and MBTA. And of course they will! They could hardly avoid it given how much the public has already seen. However, a former DOJ official saying BP will likely be brought up on charges is very different from my calling for an independent NGO to assess the damage and wildlife casualty rates.

The government is restricting press access to the Coast, thus controlling the national narrative (which is a nice way of saying they're engaging in propaganda). The government may have what they consider a compelling reason for low-balling the casualty numbers. One I can think of off the top of my head is international relations with the UK, or even just to control domestic political spin/fallout. Of course it makes no sense to us mere mortals, but to trust the government to fully disclosure the wildlife casualty rates is to believe the government works for the people who elect it and not the corporations that fund election campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #36
57. Having the injured birds be filmed/photographed is the best means of
bringing justice. Do not crime scenes/victims have the area/person photographed extensively to document the situation?
So, are the government investigators sending in teams of photographers to document? I do not see any attempt by the government, and feel the press, the '4th estate' as ESSENTIAL in this.

They may use the excuse of for the animals' protection, but lets face it, half of even those rescued are going to die. What better way to have their deaths mean and count for something, if only to convey through photographs, the testimony of their plight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #31
43. The crime scene must be protected to avoid the possibility that
Edited on Sun Jun-13-10 01:41 AM by JDPriestly
someone could add or remove evidence. Now I understand what is going on. It may be that the area is considered to be a crime scene. That may well be why no one is allowed to go there.

Remember the O.J. Simpson case? One of the problems was that some employee of the police department, not sure whether it was a detective or someone from forensics, was alleged to have carried a vial of blood from Simpson to the crime scene. Something like that can make it possible for a defendant to claim that the evidence against the defendant was tampered with by the police or others.

So, that could be the reason that no press is permitted in certain areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriplD Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Protecting evidence, or blocking the collection on evidence?
Edited on Sat Jun-12-10 06:02 PM by TriplD
How else does preventing photographs relate to a body of evidence other than to diminish the amount of evidence???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
64. i'd bet on blocking evidence...
Edited on Sun Jun-13-10 02:07 PM by awoke_in_2003
welcome to DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
32. WOW! Suppresssion gets worse by the day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
37. Frame what We the People see...
...Control what We the People think about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #37
45. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
39. BP owns stock in every mainstream press outlet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
40. This crap has been going on since day one..those of us on the Gulf have tried to tell people here
Edited on Sat Jun-12-10 11:38 PM by flyarm
only to be censored or called names..
Our government along with BP have been engaged in a huge cover up. FROM THE GET GO!

Many or most of us on the gulf coast in numerous states have known for 50 days or so what you are only now learning about!

We have tried to tell people..but when people don't want to know they shut out truth,some deliberately and some for other reasons..I don't not understand, nor do I want to.

Our local news were immediately shut down by the Coast Guard and BP ..long before the national news corps showed up and got serious about this gusher. As well as animal rescue people and our scientists.

Dead Dolphin are being hidden ..as well as whales and manatee.

The worst is yet to come.

Our government is and has been der-licit in their duty to protect the American people and our nation and has turned over their responsibility to a foreign corporation!

This is both angering and beyond sad to learn that our government would sell us all out this way. But they have nonetheless.

Much of it is CYA..and the rest they do not want the entire nation pissed off..They are willing to let us on the Gulf get fucked..but they could not withstand the entire nation pissed off or in panic. There are dangers with this Gusher that has scientists scared shitless!

Understand this..our government's main job is to protect the American people..and our nation ..they have failed miserably at that, and they don't want you to know it!

Sure, you will get the lovely Photo opps..but we on the gulf will get bad air ..water supply cut or exposed to god knows what..dead fish and marine life on our beaches ..dead wild life and dead marshes and a dead ocean...oil and toxic shit in our air and on our beaches...loss of livelyhoods and a ruined economy..for perhaps decades..but this government of ours doesn't want you to get pissed off in the rest of the nation..so they will do anything..and I mean anything, to try to minimize the damage that YOU know about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #40
46. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #40
68. K&R your post, and thank you for speaking out.

:thumbsup:

It's critically important to know the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
47. Sharks will take care of the evidence regarding Sperm Whales, turtles
and dolphins who are trying to avoid the shorelines. Dispersants will assure that. And there is another law that was broken: failure to get a permit to drill in a habitat for endangered species.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
48. It's a national security risk
to take pictures of oil soaked birds, and sealife.


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
49. It's the same country we had when the energy barons were...
totally unregulated. America 1890-1935.

Unions trashed and weakened. A federal government that is owned and operated by the powers that pay off under the table.

Keep in mind Ludlow and Matewan. Times when the national guard became the energy company's private Einsatzgruppen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. precisely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shining Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
50. K&R
The more it changes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
52. they did the same thing in new orleans - stop the news n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
53. Don't be naive not to think the WH
doesn't have nothing to do with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
54. K&R.. so much for freedom of the press..
So much for freedom in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
55. Oh yea ...our military defending the Constitution again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
58. fascism... too bad you don't get to elect Presidents and CEO's huh?
the libertarian dream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
60. This is Corporatism, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
61. K&R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
66. It is the same as them not showing the caskets of our war dead.
We let them do it then.

Of course they will go back to the same playbook.

We already lost America.

It happened for good sometime during the Bush presidency. 9/11 facilitated it.

It was happening back then in the first year when everyone drove around with the little 99 cents flags displayed proudly outside their car windows. Remember, the little Chinese-made US flags? When everyone was cheering about shock N awe? That's when they really knew they had us.

They manufactured reality and, during the break, they stole the furniture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC