Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1/3 of required federal inspections on oil rig weren't conducted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:34 PM
Original message
1/3 of required federal inspections on oil rig weren't conducted
Federal inspectors failed to conduct nearly a third of required inspections on the Deepwater Horizon rig in the 28 months before it exploded and sank in the Gulf of Mexico, according to government records.

The inspections that were carried out by the Minerals Management Service found no sign of trouble on BP's Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, according to documents posted Friday on the Interior Department's website.

MMS reports, including one dated three weeks before the deadly April 20 explosion, indicate that the rig's blowout preventer was functioning properly, and they make no mention of any persistent problems with surges of natural gas, or "kicks," flowing up through the well and disrupting drilling.

Although the cause of the disaster remains under investigation, experts have blamed the explosion on a natural gas surge. A prominent outside investigator, UC Berkeley engineering professor Robert Bea, said last month that rig workers told him the Deepwater Horizon had battled repeated kicks in the weeks before its sinking. MMS inspectors noted the presence of a kick in October 2008, but none later.

"It appears that the Deepwater Horizon experienced dangerous gas 'kicks' before the April 20 disaster," said David Pettit, a senior attorney and drilling expert for the Natural Resources Defense Council, who reviewed the inspection reports Friday. "It is hard to understand why MMS did not learn about this potentially deadly problem" before the explosion.

Despite federal regulations mandating that inspections be done monthly, the rig operation was only inspected three times over the first four months of this year; nine times in 2009 and six times in 2008. Officials at the Interior Department, which houses MMS, say rigs can miss inspections because they're on the move or because of weather conditions.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-oil-spill-20100612,0,907235.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Again, an appropriate pic for such threads:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Officials say rigs can miss inspections because they're on the move"
Who, the inspectors? The rigs? What a bunch of hooey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. The Earth...It is rotating AND spinning around the Sun..AT THE SAME TIME!! donchano.
:silly: :crazy: :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. then there is this sign at the local printers' from last week:
Why is it that the Oil Companies in this country are so awful??

The Oil Companies are in California, Texas, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Louisiana and Mississippi.

The dipsticks who measure their activities are in Washington D.C.

Enough said.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Sadly, the local legislatures and governments are no better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Nope they really aren't worried about the constituents at any level
Edited on Sat Jun-12-10 06:15 PM by truedelphi
But I assume whoever put up that sign didn't want it to go on and on for three to thirty pages.

California has the highest priced gas in the nation.

Yet we have refineries right in the S.F. Bay Area. We are probably the only geographic location where we are fleeced for oil even as they ruin our health with the "minor outgassing" from the refineries.

Di Feinstein is always "looking into" it for us...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I would sooner see Di go away than Barbara Boxer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. You left out how the galaxy is spinning and the universe expanding, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. the piles of money
That is what is "on the move."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveVictory Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. damn that Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Damn Bush and Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. The inspectors missed all the details...
because they were being wined and dined and XXXX in New Orleans' French Quarter. We know what great hosts those BP guys are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. That field
is apparently composed of 10% oil and 90% gas so I'd guess surges would be inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. I want a TEAM of safety and environmental inspectors on EVERY SINGLE
RIG on land or sea.
Paid for by the operators of the rig.

Is that too much to ask for???????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. No, it is not too much to ask for.
An excellent suggestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xjymnastjme Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. possibly with wages, but you should act on this idea!
I'm not sure how strongly you feel on this issue since you only touched on it with two sentences and a fragment, but if you think this is an idea to solve or at least help the situation, maybe you should contact Congress and the 35 congressional leaders. Much bigger waves can be made if you directly contact those in power. They could use our ideas to formulate bigger and better actions, but not if we don't tell them what we want, think, or need...

Contacting our state representatives wouldn't be enough in this situation. It needs to reach a bigger audience with power. I just tried this service on GripeGenie's website (www.GripeGenie.com) called Contact Congress, which would make this SO easy to quickly send your thoughts to whoever (or everyone) in Congress. We should really start acting on any issue we truly stand for where regulations, decisions, and courses of action can achieve what we're seeking.

While posting on these blogs promotes a smaller virtual community, our message doesn't get to those who can really DO something about it! It bothers me because I'm sure the government doesn't read all the article and blog comments about our issues and I'm sure that in the slough just from this site, there are really good ideas and arguments floating around that will never see past the Internet!

The exact effort put into these blog replies and posts is all it takes to contact your state's rep/senator or anyone else in Congress via GripeGenie.com so check it out and make a difference with your comments and ideas!

Create the change you're seeking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Which doesn't excuse negligence.
They still had the obligation to comply whether inspected or not. They want to lay the blame on the gov't for not watching their dishonest asses but that better not fly in any court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Rec.
Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spaghetti House Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. Atlas Farted
Not Atlas Shrugged, the libertarian manifesto, but Atlas let loose a little gas. "We couldn't have foreseen this problem based on stuff that came up that shouldn't have been coming up."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xjymnastjme Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. hahahahaha nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Does that mean that 2/3of the inspections actually WERE done?? I do not believe even that much was
done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. no
2/3 of the reports claiming that inspections happened were done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
26. This stuff's just going to keep on coming out and out and out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
27. Grr!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
28. sigh... and my friend met a BP lawyer
in a restaurant. Here is his twitter of the event:


BootsRiley Took my daughter to dinner4her B-day recently. Fancy restaurant. Next to us was a couple. Wife intro'd hubby as "a copyright lawyer"(contd)
about 10 hours ago via web

Hubby said "She's lying 4 me. I'm head counsel for BP.But not proud of it." Among other things, I said "It looks like BP'll b shellin (cont)

out a lot of money soon." he said "Not really. We'll wait for the first fisherman to file suit, then settle 2 years later. (contd)

All the legislations heavily on our side." Then he got up to walk away and said, "Because we wrote the legislation."


Bastards.... can you imagine having the balls to say this to a complete stranger? They just don't give a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC