Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wolf Blitzer Looks Other Way While GOP Operative Lies About CNN's Own Poll

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 02:40 PM
Original message
Wolf Blitzer Looks Other Way While GOP Operative Lies About CNN's Own Poll
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2007/05/wolf_blitzer_lo.php

Wolf Blitzer Looks Other Way While GOP Operative Lies About CNN's Own Poll
May 09, 2007

Here's a sad postcript to the news about that really interesting CNN poll that came out late yesterday. Give this a watch:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4grjADZn0E&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Etalkingpointsmemo%2Ecom%2Fhorsesmouth%2F2007%2F05%2Fwolf%5Fblitzer%5Flo%2Ephp

As you may have noticed, Wolf's guest, GOP operative Rich Galen, said the following about CNN's numbers on support for withdrawal timetables:

"Sixty-one percent in that same poll said that they -- they disagreed with a timeline. They agreed with benchmarks. But 61 percent of the American people disagreed with them...when it comes down to the crunch, paying for the soldiers, paying -- paying the bills to continue this war against terrorism, that's 61 percent of the American people."

Wolf didn't challenge this in any way.

Wolf! The man is deceiving your viewers about your own network's poll. After all, CNN's survey showed that 57% support withdrawal timelines. Galen says 61% opposes them. But 57 plus 61 equals 118. My rudimentary understanding of mathematics tells me that the maximum number for a percentage is 100.

In reality, the poll actually found that 41%, not 61%, opposes timetables. The 61% Galen was referring to was the number that backs an approach that uses benchmarks without timetables, as Galen also pointed out. But it emphatically does not refer to the number that opposes timetables -- again, 41% -- when people are directly asked about them. The overarching political reality that there's solid majority support both for an approach that uses timetables (57%) and for an approach that uses only benchmarks (61%). Galen, for obvious reasons, was trying to obscure this reality. That's why he conflated the numbers the way he did.

This is important stuff, Wolf. Don't let the Galens of the world lie to your viewers about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wolf is a replug
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I don't know about that....
but he IS a gutless simpleton that has absolutely NO business being the anchor of any news program. He lets the Reich-Wingers walk all over him then asks for more. They guy is a real zero. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Do you expect The Corporate Newz NetWERK to agree with reality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. This reminds of another brilliant conservative mind on CNN about two years ago
bush's poll numbers were in the 44% mark. The moron bush supporting syncophant said that the margin of error in this poll was +/- 3.5% so bush's actual numbers could be 51%. "Conservative" math.

+3.5 + +3.5 +44 = 51 - brilliant. - is no negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC