Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LEGACY OF SCIENTIFIC FRAUD HONED BY BUSH ADMINISTRATION

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 03:17 PM
Original message
LEGACY OF SCIENTIFIC FRAUD HONED BY BUSH ADMINISTRATION
i think what really gripes me is that they haven't even made an attempt to correct the deliberatemisinformation they put ou there that is going to be sucking the time and energy out of the next administration for years just to get us back to even. the government should give shrubya a bill once the cost of repairing the falsifications are known.
--###--

original-peer

For Immediate Release: May 9, 2007
Contact: Carol Goldberg (202) 265-7337

LEGACY OF SCIENTIFIC FRAUD HONED BY BUSH ADMINISTRATION —

Julie MacDonald Scandal Symptomatic of Broad Pattern of Mendacity

Washington, DC — Since its inception, the Bush administration has manipulated and misrepresented the findings of its own scientists to frustrate the intent of the Endangered Species Act, according to testimony released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). The testimony is part of an oversight hearing today conducted by the House Natural Resources Committee.

The hearing addresses the abrupt resignation of Interior Deputy Assistant Secretary Julie MacDonald in the wake of an Inspector General report finding that she falsified agency scientific findings and improperly supplied internal drafts of agency documents to the Farm Bureau and property rights groups. According to the PEER testimony:

* Manipulation of scientific Endangered Species Act (ESA) documents has become pervasive with hundreds of agency biologists reporting their work being revised for political reasons;
* Former Interior Secretary Gale Norton fostered a “lie to succeed” culture in which managers who commit scientific fraud get promoted while scientists who persist in disclosing inconvenient facts are marginalized or fired; and
* The pattern of mendacity extends beyond the Interior Department, as fishery biologists working on ESA issues within the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) relate routine political interference with scientific assessments.

“Julie MacDonald was not a lone rogue; she was merely following orders to keep the Administration’s friends comfortable,” stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, who appears on a panel with Deputy Interior Secretary Lynn Scarlett. “If the Bush administration will not provide enforceable pledges to faithfully reflect the environmental science produced by the public agency specialists, then Congress should step in.”

PEER is proposing that Congress require written justification of all changes made by political appointees and commission an independent review to identify and correct past acts of scientific fraud. In addition, PEER is urging Congress to strengthen whistleblower laws so as to provide scientists with sorely lacking legal protection and review cases of scientists whose careers have been destroyed for political reasons.

“Interior has yet to correct any of the scientific errors that its own Inspector General found,” added Ruch, noting that unless Interior cures the defective ESA findings, the courts will be required to address them one-by-one in citizen suits brought by conservation groups. “Starting with Julie MacDonald, this revival of congressional oversight will hopefully mean that serial political manipulators will be held to account.”

###















complete release including links to other sources here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC