Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Setbacks Cloud U.S. Plans to Get Out of Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 06:49 AM
Original message
Setbacks Cloud U.S. Plans to Get Out of Afghanistan
Setbacks Cloud U.S. Plans to Get Out of Afghanistan
By PETER BAKER and MARK LANDLER
Published: June 14, 2010

WASHINGTON — Six months after President Obama decided to send more forces to Afghanistan, the halting progress in the war has crystallized longstanding tensions within the government over the viability of his plan to turn around the country and begin pulling out by July 2011.

Within the administration, the troubles in clearing out the Taliban from a second-tier region and the elusive loyalties of the Afghan president have prompted anxious discussions about whether the policy can work on the timetable the president has set. Even before the recent setbacks, the military was highly skeptical of setting a date to start withdrawing, but Mr. Obama insisted on it as a way to bring to conclusion a war now in its ninth year.

For now, the White House has decided to wait until a review, already scheduled for December, to assess whether the target date can still work. But officials are emphasizing that the July 2011 withdrawal start will be based on conditions in the country, and that the president has yet to decide how quickly troops will be pulled out.

Even if some troops do begin coming home then, the officials said that it may be a small number at first. Given that he has tripled the overall force since taking office, Mr. Obama could still end his term with more forces in Afghanistan than when he began it.

“Things are not looking good,” said Bruce O. Riedel, a regional specialist at the Brookings Institution who helped formulate the administration’s first Afghan strategy in early 2009. “There’s not much sign of the turnaround that people were hoping for.”

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. never-ending war
Delightful </sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hoocoodanoed?
Wars always go as planned, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. set back HA! It is to protect companies coming in to mine n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. It will not be President Obama to end this war.
Even if he gets two terms. It will be the next President (or the one after that) to end the unnecessary war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. The war is absolute madness
No matter how much money, how many soldiers or how long we stay, the Afghanis will end up fighting amongst themselves for control of the country the minute we leave. We are accomplishing nothing other than making a very tiny group of people very wealthy and many thousands more who invest in war making companies through their 401k's etc. a little more wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Too bad our leaders cannot be honest, and just say
Edited on Tue Jun-15-10 07:51 AM by SoCalDem
"You people over here are not interested in moving past the 13th century...call us when you are ready to join the rest of the world.. see ya!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gimama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. too many "setbacks"
to bring the Troops HOME.
'specially with all that gold layin' around:(
thank YOU for postin this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. The only setback was the discovery of $1T in mineral deposits.
AMERICA FUCK YEAH!
\
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. Well, hell, why leave now? There are all those priceless minerals to mine!
:eyes:

What part of "we are never leaving" do they think we don't understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. one of the setbacks is that the just tripped over a big pile of gold and other precious metals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. We lost. Get out. Get over it. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. gee. who could've ever foreseen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. insane and never-ending
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC