Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House GOP to force vote to nix individual mandate from health reform

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 04:53 PM
Original message
House GOP to force vote to nix individual mandate from health reform
Edited on Tue Jun-15-10 04:53 PM by WeDidIt
House GOP to force vote to nix individual mandate from health reform

House Republicans will look to force a vote Tuesday afternoon to repeal the individual mandate provisions within Democrats' healthcare bill.

Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.), the ranking member of the House Ways and Means Committee, will offer a motion to recommit on a small-business tax cut bill this afternoon that would look to strike the provision from the Democrats' healthcare reform law.

The vote comes as part of the GOP's "America Speaking Out" initiative, one of House Republicans' programs seeking online engagement with constituents.

<snip>


From The Hill

My absolute statement: I FIRMLY oppose the GOP on this and everything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good, the individual mandate blows chunks..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Don't we have an individual mandate for Social Security and Medicare?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. To private corporations whose only task is to maximize return for their shareholders?
No..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not every health insurance provider is "for-profit"
In some States, there are co-ops, non-profits, etc...

And I assume that eventually and incrementally the age for Medicare eligibility will fall and give more people the "public option."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. They are still private corporations, not a government entity..
And you can assume whatever you want, but the fact remains that the public mandate by no means assures that the person paying the premium will get medical care if and when they need it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burnsei sensei Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I think you'd be surprised at just how
similarly non-profit businesses can be to for-profit ones.
Particularly in health care and insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Only if you have employment
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Perhaps . . .
But is there a better mechanism for ensuring fairness in terms of eliminating denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions? Without a mandate of some sort, people will decline to purchase insurance until they get sick, then demand coverage after years or even decades of neglect of their health.

Single payer would eliminate that, of course, but that's not an option right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yuugal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. you talk about fair?
How is being forced to buy something we can't afford to use because of copays and deductibles fair? All this law did was mandate that private ins cos will always have a constant flow of our money with which to pay for lobbying against any attempts to end this criminal scam. They will also use our money to build bigger mansions and take even more extravagant vacations. Hooray for them.

I'm sure the Aetna's of the world will price the copays and deductibles of the chronically ill at a price point where they will be just as screwed as they were before. Most of us who are not upper middle class or rich already have endured "years or even decades of neglect of their health". Now we will be forced to pay for the privilege of not getting care.

Are you looking forward to your "bronze" plan or are you one of the lucky people in life?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Under the jerrybuilt system we currently have
There has to be some kind of mechanism for getting people to sign up for insurance before they need it. I'm not enthusiastic about it, but it's what we have. I'd certainly like to see single payer available to all, but since that doesn't exist, then this is the system we have to work within.

As such, nobody will buy health insurance until they actually need it. And no doubt some wouldn't purchase insurance until they had a diagnosis of some dread disease in an advanced stage. Then, being Americans, they would want gold-plated treatment (aka a miracle) to save them after years of neglecting their health, refusing to get regular check-ups, and disregarding any health advice (all the while ridiculing people who did do those things as being suckers for paying into and participating in the system). As long as people can get something for nothing, they will.

At least, with the individual mandate, there will be some controls on the system, controls that are missing right now. Yes, it will be cumbersome and awkward, and will take time to work out (hopefully toward single payer). But magic wands being in short supply, neither you nor I can wave one that replaces the current screwed system with something better overnight. I fully expect a rough transition, but I also expect it to be a little better than the current system, which is even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. And a mechanism that gets people to pay for insurance they can't afford to use is ideal..
For the insurance companies..

For regular Americans, not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The individual mandate is absolutely necessary unless ...
we adopt a truly-universal system where everyone is automatically covered.

The GOP must be stopped from defacing health reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Bingo
If they succeed, HCR is back to square one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Health *care* reform never left square one to start with..
Having health insurance is no guarantee that one will be able to afford actual health care..

I've seen literally dozens of posts here on DU from people who have insurance but cannot afford to use it due to high copays and high deductibles.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. The individual mandate still does not assure that the person paying a premium gets health *care*..
Sure, you'll have insurance but insurance is not the same thing as coverage.

Ask all the people here on DU that have insurance but can't afford to use it thanks to high deductibles and copays, I've read many such posts over the last few years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hilarious, because this was a GOP idea originally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burnsei sensei Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Yes it was.
And I have yet to see even one Democrat rub that into these fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC