|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
zabet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 08:12 PM Original message |
Pelosi's new office is House's costliest by far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. commercial office space in San Fran is notoriously expensive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virgogal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 08:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. She could have stayed at the $4300 a month office. This is outrageous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 09:20 AM Response to Reply #6 |
26. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 06:11 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. The old office rent was not nearly as "notoriously expensive." It looks like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
2. Bet she didn't look hard for something cheaper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. WTF!!! That's outrageous. First a tax payer plane and now this??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 08:31 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. 'Tax payer plane?' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 09:09 AM Response to Reply #4 |
23. LOL! Somebody has not watch the news much. LMFAO!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 11:13 AM Response to Reply #23 |
29. LOL yourself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 12:14 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Ha Ha Ha Like I said. It is a post 9-11 policy that needs to go away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 08:38 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. The Speaker is second in the line of succession and the head of the legislative branch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 09:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. She is head of the House not of the legislative branch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 06:46 PM Response to Reply #10 |
31. The Speaker is the de facto head of the legislative branch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 08:53 AM Response to Reply #5 |
21. One that is incorrect and two that level of "security" (luxury) isn't needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 09:18 AM Response to Reply #5 |
24. It is way past time for that post 9-11 policy to go by by. It is a needless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 09:19 AM Response to Reply #5 |
25. So? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. Deleted message |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
8. Comments on this thread have me convinced I have mistakenly gone to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 08:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 09:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. So as Democrats we are supposed to accept any expense whatsoever? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 02:01 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 06:12 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Waste of taxpayer dollars crosses party lines. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 06:34 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. I thought I fell off of a bridge and into |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rebubula (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 07:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Agreed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 08:02 AM Response to Reply #8 |
19. We have more Larouchies posting here than Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 08:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
22. So what level of misuse of taxpyaer funds would it take to outrage you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 09:20 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 06:31 AM Response to Original message |
15. It's not like tax payers are losing any money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yella_dawg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 08:00 AM Response to Original message |
18. Did anyone read the original post?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fatdogsc (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 08:50 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Same shit different pile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NuttyFluffers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 09:48 AM Response to Reply #18 |
28. no one reads jack here anymore. it's the Fed's office setting the rate, not Pelosi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC