Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon report in April never mentioned $1 trillion in Afghan wealth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 01:13 PM
Original message
Pentagon report in April never mentioned $1 trillion in Afghan wealth
Pentagon report in April never mentioned $1 trillion in Afghan wealth
By Muriel Kane
Wednesday, June 16th, 2010 -- 10:37 am

A RAW STORY investigation has revealed that a report released by the Pentagon last April on the progress of the Afghanistan "surge" included only a single passing reference to a survey that is now being touted as having discovered mineral resources in that nation potentially worth $1 trillion.

The lack of any mention of dramatic new discoveries is likely to reinforce suspicions that there is something bogus about the claim in last Sunday's New York Times that "the United States has discovered nearly $1 trillion in untapped mineral deposits in Afghanistan, far beyond any previously known reserves and enough to fundamentally alter the Afghan economy and perhaps the Afghan war itself."

The only reference to minerals in April's 152-page Pentagon report occurs in a section of just two paragraphs devoted to the Task Force for Business and Stability Operations (TFBSO), whose survey last fall supposedly revealed the newly-found resources.

~snip~

The story of new-found wealth has already aroused widespread skepticism, especially since a detailed US Geological Survey report on Afghanistan's mineral resources was published as recently as 2007. Wired, for example, suggests that "the timing of the 'discovery' seems just a little too convenient. As Blake Hounshell at Foreign Policy notes, the Obama administration is struggling to combat the perception that the Afghan campaign has 'made little discernible progress,' despite thousands of additional troops and billions of extra dollars."

What may be an even more acute observation, however, was offered by Jim Lobe at Asia Times. "The Pentagon memo may have been an effort to attract international interest in the mining sector before the auction in the next few weeks of the 1.8 billion-ton iron-ore field in Hajigak, which could be worth $5 billion to $6 billion," Lobe writes. "Afghan and Western officials want more companies to bid for Hajigak and other deposits to prevent China from gaining control over Afghanistan’s natural resources through bids subsidized heavily by Beijing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, in a war, it's so easy to overlook minor things.
Minor things like $1 trillion in natural deposits.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am sure this would not be the first time...nor the last time..such a crock of
crapola will have emerged from the war in Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, etc etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well that should help pay for the war!
(And that'll happen when pigs fly)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC