|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Jack_DeLeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:21 PM Original message |
So if the relief well fails would you support the nuclear option? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. For a minute there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doc03 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
2. I don't know if we should follow the example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. No. I'd support another relief well. And another. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
4. the bed may be unstable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_DeLeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. You wouldnt be setting this off on the surface of the sea floor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. NO. It makes no sense. There is no logical reason to believe that it would work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
6. No, we should allow the entire reservoir to leak out into the GoM.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_DeLeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Ever heard of Poe's Law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_DeLeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Nope... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinboy3niner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 12:18 AM Response to Reply #13 |
29. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 12:38 AM Response to Reply #13 |
32. I recced this thread just for this reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
8. And what if it just opens it up bigger? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_DeLeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Well like I said what if the only alternative is to let the oil keep pouring out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I'd still have to say no. At some point the well will stop producing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 09:17 AM Response to Reply #8 |
49. I believe Rachel had a physicist on her show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
10. NO. Not under any circumstances |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
12. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinboy3niner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
14. No!!!!!!! Recklessness is what got us into this crisis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_DeLeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:52 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. My opinion is that if there litterly is no other option to stop this then yes try it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 12:01 AM Response to Reply #14 |
23. A controlled blast doesn't have to be "reckless" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinboy3niner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 12:09 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Without enough experience to assure a positive result w/o unintended consequences... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 01:27 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Then so would doing anything under 1 mile of water |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinboy3niner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 02:26 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. The risks inherent in a nuclear blast hardly compare to other options nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
15. Depends on the results of simulations and the idea and data being peer reviewed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_DeLeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:55 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Sounds good to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
17. If it blows up BP, then yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
20. Fuck no, simply nuts. I don't care what the Russians did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-21-10 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
22. Yes. They should of canned the filibuster long before the health insurance reform debacle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSPS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
24. Aw, geez. Not this shit again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
25. Not just no, but hell no. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
26. This is not a movie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 06:31 AM Response to Reply #26 |
45. Sure it is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 12:05 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. I got ... screen writing softare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
28. I speak for the people of New Orleans when I say, HELL FUCKING NO!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Petrushka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
30. No . . . especially because the Russians advocate it. Photos of one Soviet [**uh**] "remedy" ---> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turborama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 02:58 AM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Video link from that site... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Petrushka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 03:04 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Thanks for the link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ribrepin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
31. Hell no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 02:50 AM Response to Original message |
35. Absolutely fucking NOT!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 03:08 AM Response to Original message |
38. I don't think you can even have a rational discussion about it without solid, quantifiable data |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PJPhreak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 03:33 AM Response to Original message |
39. Ok,Here is the skinny on this VERY Stupid Idea... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Petrushka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 03:57 AM Response to Original message |
40. "There is a video I saw that claims it was used to stop a natural gas leak." ?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWebHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 04:02 AM Response to Original message |
41. I think it's an option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PJPhreak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 04:05 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Please see my post above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWebHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 04:24 AM Response to Original message |
43. former nuclear submarine officer op-ed for conventional explosion in Monday's NYT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 06:24 AM Response to Original message |
44. No, no, no, no and no .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 06:36 AM Response to Original message |
46. Only if Cheney and Hayward are strapped to the nuke. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
47. Fuck no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-22-10 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
48. It's just not suitable for this geology. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC