Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't want the WH to fire McCrystal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 08:59 AM
Original message
I don't want the WH to fire McCrystal
I want them to pressure him into resigning. I want to see a statement from McCrystal to the effect that due to his unfortunate and inflammatory comments he can no longer effectively lead.

Yes, I'm taking politics into account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. He can give the President his resignation tomorrow at the meeting, it can be leaked today along with
who will be his replacement.

I also want all of his jerkoff minions in his clique demoted and relocated too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Me too. I predict he will resign
Why should he be allowed to soil Obama by forcing Obama to fire him? Resign, ass hole. Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. He should be fired
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 09:34 AM by Hutzpa
because this is the second time he has done this sort of thing, he did it in London not too long ago and
now this, showing gross disrespect to the CiC is not a sign of a disciplined General.

This is not the first time either.

So all this patronizing sale is just that, patronizing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. True, but
If the president has to fire him it will just give the right wingers a chance to go after the president, and with the mess they are in already with the BP apology they would love to find something to take the heat off of them, and put it on president Obama. I think him resigning would be better than being fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It is a Democratic Government
the people voted in 2008 and wanted Democrats to run the country, if they wanted Republicans they should have
voted overwhelmingly for McCain/Palin ticket but did not- my point is why bother ourselves with what the Republicans
think when so far what they have showed us is a party of non participation.

Why should democrats continue to make decisions based on what republicans think, this kind of thinking will get us no
where and will definitely make life much more difficult for those running for election on democratic ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Because it may not be a Democratic Government after the November
elections, at least the legislative branch. What I took away from the post was that firing over resignation would lead to GOP talking points. While those talking points may not sway many here on DU they are powerfull in ramping up GOP enthusiasm and resonate with the end all, be all of modern US politics - independents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thats what I call sideway thinking
your premise is completely off, democrats should be afraid to rule because of GOP backlash? if anything the left will
be much more upset with Obama and thats who he should be worried about instead of worrying about a group that will never
vote for him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Independents. That is the key. They can and do vote for Democrats
sometimes. I believe they are more deferential to military leadership than us here on DU. Many Democratic House and Senate members cannot retain their seats without independent support. In the Presidential election they (along with enthusiasm and GOTV)are the only group that matters. The left is mainly marginalized in general elections. Since we are in an almost perpetual election cycle now, each congress has about a year to do anything major before having to moderate back to the middle to get reelected.

This is not how I want it to be, just as I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. How long can we keep calling stuff as we see it?
without any action, how about making changes so we don't have to put up with the same
crap day in day out.

Obama need to energize his base and as statistics shows his base which includes independent
I might add, is much more larger than Republicans. So what should it be, staying moderate
or firing up the base....which is it?

What was the difference in percentage between independents and democrats voting for Obama?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I don't know the % of independents that voted for the President but
IIRC, he won among them. There are some I's that always vote D and others that always vote R. There is a significant portion of I's that switch between the two main parties - far larger % than Ds or Rs that switch. In this and the next presidential election I fear I's will, if not break R, will not be out for Ds and the President as they were in 2006/8 when Bush was around to remind them why we needed change. Add in the disaffected left and you have significant R gains.

Why do I think I's will break R? Non stop criticism of the President by most media, the economy is not adding jobs fast enough, immigration, the response to the BP spill, and, maybe some push back from the military (what the OP was about). I guess we will see in a few months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
17.  not because of GOP backlash but because of potential voter backlash
why wrap a big bow on talking points and hand it to the repukes? What you are not taking into account is the majority of independent voters are somewhere in the middle and can be persuaded to vote dem or repuke and many if not most of them hold the military in high regard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Good point, but
what about the majority of 'I' voters who would like to see the Democrats grow a pair.

During the last election there where all sort of statistics about how real Americans
will not vote for Obama, the independents would not vote him and they even went as
far as saying elderly Americans would not vote for him, my point is this, if we
continue to listen to noise of the market we would never buy anything.

I'm sure you are quite aware of the Republicans being in power not too long ago,
I don't remember them asking permission from the Democrats when they where
screwing things up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dynasaw Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. What He Forgot
that the president is his commander in chief. Keep thinking as to how he would have reacted if his subordinates had done what he did. Sheer arrogance,
or stupidity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. It is apparently expected that he will arrive with a letter or resignation
Apparently, that is pretty much the course after such a blunder at that level. Obama can then elect or not to accept...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. I don't care which it is--McChrystal is an insubordinate little snot
and deserves to be punished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. I disagree
A resignation makes it look like Pres Obama is the problem and he can't deal with having him as CIC. Nor do I think he should be fired. Demoted a star and sent back to finish the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think you will see him announcing his retirement.
Isn't that how it's done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. If you're concerned with politics, you should hope Obama fires him.
You should hope McChrystal's dismissal comes from the White House, and not Petraeus. Right now he looks like a wimp who can't even command the respect of people who are legally obligated to show him some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. fire him. take his pension. he's a rogue soldier.
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 06:16 PM by spanone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
20. Take away his stars and send him to the front.
Buh-bye.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. Either way, he never should have been 'hired' in the first place.
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 06:26 PM by Fire1
I don't know whose idea that was, but they fucked up royally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC