|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:18 PM Original message |
As for the myth that Obama packed the Fiscal Commission |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. Bigger and more important question - why in the world would he not simply GO ON |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Hear, hear; hear, hear; hear, hear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. He HAS gone on the record. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
27. Talk is cheap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. That is what I am trying to point out. That his actions are being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moriah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 11:09 PM Response to Reply #33 |
92. Actually, that wasTrueDelphi..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
4. I'm really worried about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. That's another point. All the commission will do is generate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 08:07 PM Response to Reply #6 |
70. "It's just a report, with recommendations." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-28-10 12:50 AM Response to Reply #70 |
107. exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. Reid hold strong? He appointed Kent Conrad and Max Baucus! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
5. Thank you, that was quite informative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
7. Pete Peterson is funding the commission's activities. Why??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. No, the funding is coming from the WH. Hensarling was not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 08:13 PM Response to Reply #24 |
72. corporate/foundation money are funding the town halls, not the white house. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 10:55 PM Response to Reply #72 |
85. Exactly. And the town halls are NOT the fiscal reform commission. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 11:00 PM Response to Reply #85 |
89. not the commission, but part of the activities surrounding the commission. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 11:18 PM Response to Reply #89 |
94. But that's a far cry from funding the commission. And still doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-28-10 12:38 AM Response to Reply #94 |
103. i didn't say he funded the commission, i said there's a reason why that distinction is blurred, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
31. Peter G. Peterson, of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, has two of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:17 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Neither of them was appointed by Obama. And why do say Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
8. You have got to be shitting. The whole lot appointed by Obama is hopeless minus Stern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Stern made some deals that are suspect... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Not my favorite labor leader, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. All with previous proven budget success. And if you research |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 08:15 PM Response to Reply #22 |
73. "budget success" - lol. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnArmyVeteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 10:12 PM Response to Reply #8 |
82. We keep getting sold out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
9. He appointed Simpson, a republican strongly identified with the anti-ss forces. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. You are cherry-picking. Look at the other 5's complete records. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:09 PM Response to Reply #13 |
28. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
10. Huh... My List Must Not Be White House Approved... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Pssst, some of us still do trust him. And much of the criticism is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. It's Not SOLEY About Privitazation !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:11 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. I was addressing the people here who keep claiming that Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Yes... And Some Options Service The Rich, While Others Service The Rest Of Us... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:40 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Yes, and I support the ones that service the rest of us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 07:51 PM Response to Reply #30 |
67. Sounds like a "yes" to me. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-28-10 12:58 AM Response to Reply #30 |
108. "solvent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 07:26 PM Response to Reply #15 |
64. balance the budget? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 08:43 PM Response to Reply #15 |
76. You keep saying the criticism is unfounded, but have provided no evidence to support that assertion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 10:59 PM Response to Reply #76 |
88. But I have provided links demonstrating that the Dems he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-28-10 12:47 AM Response to Reply #88 |
106. right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 06:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
56. Golly! Your list reads a lot different than th' other one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 07:17 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. It's the same list, his is just cherry-picked. Do some research |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 07:54 PM Response to Reply #62 |
68. And your single-sourced quotes are the end of all info gathering? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 10:49 PM Response to Reply #68 |
84. Actually, no. I just didn't include all of my research. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moriah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 11:25 PM Response to Reply #10 |
95. I'm reading the book that people seem to be saying is the source for the "Glinton-Gingrich" pact.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
11. You want to know more about Bowles??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:55 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Did you also see my direct quote from Bowles? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 10:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
81. They conflict with those quoted by others. And you're doing talking points, not discussion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 10:57 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. My Bowles quotes come directly from Bowles website. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-28-10 12:28 AM Response to Reply #87 |
100. And this means? So he's said different-sounding things at different times. That's nice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
16. Alan Simpson alone is a sign of poor judgement at the very least. Co Chair?!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. By his own EO one of the co-chairs had to be a Repuke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. You are defending Simpson as a pick? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:08 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. If you HAD to pick a Repuke with experience balancing budgets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:11 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Oh, geez |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:26 PM Response to Reply #29 |
40. No, seriously! Who would have been your choice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-28-10 01:03 AM Response to Reply #40 |
109. easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:13 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. it didn't have to be one who wants to kill social security. one of the primary voices for killing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:24 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. Juat curious, who would have been your choice out of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 06:03 PM Response to Reply #39 |
54. The material you quote doesn't say Republicans. It says no more than four from one party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 11:11 PM Response to Reply #54 |
93. And what are the 2 parties in Congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-28-10 12:31 AM Response to Reply #93 |
101. Why does that matter? The Commission has people from outside Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
17. Seems that Simpson has a problem with the truth w/r/t Social Security --> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
18. thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
34. The myth that you have a clue............ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:21 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Yes, they do. That is what I am presenting here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
36. we shall see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:37 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. I do not have a problem with Social Security advocates - I AM one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 05:32 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. yes, that is a problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 05:45 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. True, most estimates I've read say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 06:01 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. it cannot be insolvent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 06:59 PM Response to Reply #53 |
59. I think you misunderstand my purpose. Yes, there certainly are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 07:12 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. the facts do not refute that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #60 |
79. To believe in your pattern and see this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-28-10 12:45 AM Response to Reply #79 |
105. this is not about Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 11:37 PM Response to Reply #60 |
98. The facts are that 2/3 of the people Obama appointed to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 09:23 PM Response to Reply #53 |
77. You can see the baseless assumptions all around you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #48 |
74. it will be solvent even in 2037 and beyond. "insolvent" mean NO FUNDS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
41. Why didn't my rec count? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 06:13 PM Response to Reply #41 |
57. Over your quota? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
44. Here is more about Peterson and his money behind the commission. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 05:14 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Yes, I read that - and no where does it say that Peterson has any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 05:42 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. What the H do you think "partnering with" means? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 05:50 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Read it again. One person said that it has "plans" to "partner" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 05:58 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. That person is Bruce Reed, head of the DLC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 06:06 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Again, have you seen any evidence that it is currently partnering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 07:15 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. Oh my, I just quoted Reed's words to you. You really are in denial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 07:20 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. You still haven't answered the question. Do you have ANY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 08:29 PM Response to Reply #63 |
75. yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 11:30 PM Response to Reply #75 |
97. And what was the outcome of yesterday's fiscal summit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-28-10 12:42 AM Response to Reply #97 |
104. you forgot the other three, two of which were first on the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #61 |
69. Hey, when Obama's "Fight the Smears" is your sig line - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 10:39 PM Response to Reply #69 |
83. The facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 09:43 PM Response to Reply #45 |
80. Why do you keep misrepresenting Obama's choices? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 11:05 PM Response to Reply #80 |
90. Oh, yeah, he could have picked Sanders and Lieberman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SunsetDreams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
49. K&R for facts, thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
52. Why would he ever pick Simpson and Cote? And have you watched the actual meetings of this monster? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 06:54 PM Response to Reply #52 |
58. First of all, can you imagine what would have happened if Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 07:33 PM Response to Reply #58 |
66. Um, since when was an 'excuse' needed to 'justify' raising taxes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 11:25 PM Response to Reply #66 |
96. I'm just stating that is what the conservative meme is. Actually, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 08:11 PM Response to Reply #58 |
71. There actually were some moderate Republians around in Simpson's day. He had other choices. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-28-10 12:33 AM Response to Reply #58 |
102. who cares? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 07:30 PM Response to Original message |
65. Who are we gonna believe? You or our lying eyes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 11:09 PM Response to Reply #65 |
91. I want you to look up the actual stances of Obama's appointees. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-28-10 12:28 AM Response to Reply #91 |
99. "stances" don't mean anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-29-10 02:27 PM Response to Reply #91 |
112. Sorry. It's totally rigged and everyone can see it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joe black (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
78. Simpson is about the fucking worst. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
86. Erskine is fucking loser. Plus he tried to gut janitorial staff in the UNC system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeanpalmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-28-10 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
110. Who of his appointees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-28-10 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
111. Rec. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 02:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC