Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats dump bank bill's fee to woo Republicans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 10:32 PM
Original message
Democrats dump bank bill's fee to woo Republicans
-Yet another example of how wonderful bi-partisanship works to improve and strengthen legislation- BBI


Lawmakers dump bank bill's fee to woo GOP
House-Senate conference commitee acts after Brown's objection
NBC News and news services
June 29, 2010

WASHINGTON — Top Democratic House and Senate negotiators who worked out a deal on a sweeping overhaul of financial regulations regrouped Tuesday to eliminate a $19 billion fee on banks that had threatened to derail the legislation.

The bill's fate was thrown into doubt this week following the death of Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., and after Republican Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts vowed to abandon his support for the bill if it retained the assessment on large banks and hedge funds. The money would have been used to pay for the costs of the legislation.

Besides Brown, Republican Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, both of whom also voted for the Senate bill last month, said they also had qualms about the bank assessment that negotiators inserted into the bill last week.

Seeing nearly a year of work crumbling, Democrats scrambled to eliminate the bank fee and keep at least three of the Republicans on board.

Read the full article at:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38000701/ns/politics-capitol_hill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Democrats drop pants & bend over to woo Republicans
Works every time.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
704wipes Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I bet Scott Brown now finds another reason to vote no
as will a few of the others who had this as their 'only' objection to the bill.

Just watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I think you're 100% correct.
WHY do our Dems do this again and again and again? What don't they get? What don't they understand about the "people" they're dealing with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now the banks will be ever
happier than they were last week!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. you do know that a certain number of votes are required to pass legislation ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yes I do. 51 votes are required to pass legislation. Did you know that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. The sad part is Ted Kennedy's seat could've belonged to a Democrat.
The state party really dropped the ball by letting a Republican win that seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. the sad part is how the dems love going all neville chamberlain to the repubs nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I've sometimes speculated they were privately glad the seat was lost to a Repub.
Mainly, they now get the excuse that they don't have enough seats to pass key legislation. If they did have the necessary number of seats, then a lot of right wing Democrats would be put on the spot in the eyes of their constituents who were already unhappy with right wing Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. +100000000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. They need the votes. Especially since Senator Byrd is no longer there. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Don't they have 51 votes to pass a weak bill that meets with Republican approval?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm beginning to think Democrats don't even care about winning future elections anymore n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I'm thinking they don't care for much more than their own personal interests.
Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC