Who cares WHY the right is now against the war- Now is our chance to end this war of Terror!

Please people, let's not spend our time talking about what an idiot Ann Coulter is, we all know this...

let's just go with it!!!!!

Over one million Iraqis killed(and those numbers were from 5+ years ago)

Afghanis waiting in terror to see if their wedding will be bombed...

How much wasted money while the homeless go on hurting...


THE RIGHT HAS TURNED AGAINST THE WAR- NOW IS OUR TIME TO END IT!!!

There is hope- finally!


Then there is the Patriot Act, on top of the illegal spying(which the Congress attempted to make legal retroactively, which cannot be done without an ammendment to the Constitution), the entire Homeland Security dept NEEDS TO GO. Bush set that up and we can get rid of it.

What we need to do is tell the righties Obama is spying on you, Obama's violating the Constitution....

WHO CARES IF THEY ARE HYPOCRITES? We all know they are.

What is more important? Continuing the 'divide and conquer' or turning back everything Bush did in office?

Let's get on the same page and start moving the 'right' in the right direction.

we want to leave and we don't give a damn what happens next to the Afghans - lets just be honest about that at least....

"Hypocrite" doesn't even begin to describe these idiots. :argh:

supported the policies of Bush. The NeoCons promoted
the Interventionist, Internationalists policies. Now the
Conservatives believe it is their turn. Classical Conservatives
believe in constraint and avoiding getting mixed up in foreign
entanglements. The War is on between NeoCons and Conservatives
for the Soul of the Republican Party.

Big business versus the racists.

Unfortunately both big business and racists still win because they are going after the little guy, treating all brown people like suspects and common criminals, and big business, the ones who enable illegal immigrants to make a living because they want cheap labor, are going unpunished.

Just as it was a political opportunity for Democrats to attack the Iraq war and support the Afghan war in the 2006-2008 elections.

(apparently not for the anti-bush people who now like war and constitutional violations)

and he will then go with the right.. and finally we score one accomplishment. i like it

and forget the Bush era ever happened.

That seems to be the new RW tactic.

Who unrecced this seriously? They think we should support the wars now because the right is turning against them?

but I'm sure she'll say the opposite next week (or whenever suits her).

Michael Steele reversed his position within hours - it doesn't make sense to ally yourself with RWers.

They are just playing games, but the sheeple are listening. Now is the time to turn the sheeple against the war.

I don't care who are why someone is against the war, I want the mindless killing to end.

I see your reasoning, it could help change the political consensus.

As long as it doesn't exonerate the Repubs, they need to own their mistakes too
(otherwise they'll just rewrite history and do the same thing all over again in a few years).

"they need to own their mistakes too
(otherwise they'll just rewrite history and do the same thing all over again in a few years)"

I'm pretty sure they will never own their mistakes(I'm not THAT hopeful) and will definitely rewrite history and try to do the same thing all over again.

I just want to stop the killing. At this point I will be happy if they just stop the killing.





"Thou Shall Not Kill" Sound familiar you right wing fundie nut jobs??

I'll point out the blind-partisan hypocrisy of people like Coulter opposing the war. But, after its mentioned I don't dwell on it. Let them oppose it and help us get out.
In the same way, I don't dwell on whether this is now "Obama's war." Yes it is, but does playing the blame game get us out any faster? I don't think so.

I had hope before I posted this. I thought everyone would see it.

Now I am depressed....again....pass the blue pill...

the afghan war needs to be drawn down quickly. Its going to turn into another vietnam if we keep sending troops over there.

After the Democratic party takes a bath in the elections this year, hopefully Obama and the Dems will turn to the left for once and not be so scared of being called a damn liberal.

"Its going to turn into another vietnam" or the US is going to turn into another Russia... whichever comes first, or both!

'it's Obama's war' etc.

what do you think Anthrax Annie's answer would have been?

Let's be realistic. They're not anti-war. They're anti-Obama.

the Democratic party is going to start defending the war. They have been forced into it. This fucking thing should have been ended on day 1 of the new admin. Now they fucked themselves and countless dead soldiers as well.

We do not need to defend the war.

WE have not been forced into it.

We can rise above 'divide and conquer'.

WE are not stupid sheeple.

they are only against it for political reasons

Their sheeple will be very confused.

If Obama were to try to end the wars, they'd be for them. So it isn't really much of a chance. As soon as Dems try to turn talk into votes on the rethug side they'd all disappear into the Congressional molding. They say they're for a lot of things, but come vote time they haven't shown up yet.

However, if Obama was pressured into making the statement that he will pull the troops ASAP and makes moves toward doing so...WE WILL WIN IN A LANDSLIDE that even diebold can't fix.

on the right to oppose so a few of them are pulling from the other side to then create space on the right to maneuver again.

This is why doing the right thing and living with the consequences is the only way to deal with these dumpsterfucks.

The Reich wing peace movement is just a taste of triangulation to get out of an odd corner, at least mostly.

:hi:

:hi:

"They further predict the GOP after the midterms will change
and the Classic Conservatives will hold sway in Republican
Party. The Republican Party will be the Anti-War Party.
They will be the Party of RESTRAINT. Restraint in War Polich
Restraint in Fiscal Policy and Restraint in vitriolic speech."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8715290

Anyone?