The greatest science "scandal" "in the history of man" predictably falls apart

In their never-ending quest to prove that they understand the intricacies of climate science better than actual climate scientists, conservative media figures routinely promote any ridiculous "evidence" they think undermines the scientific consensus about climate change.

This is a group that repeatedly points to snowstorms in February as proof that global warming is not real; claims that CO2 can't be a pollutant because "we breathe" it; and ignores actual temperature data to baselessly claim that the Earth is really "cooling."

Last year, conservative climate change skeptics, in the words of Wall Street Journal's Kimberly Strassel, thought they had found a "gold mine." Conservative media figures seized on emails stolen from climate scientists and proceeded to completely distort their contents. As we pointed out repeatedly at the time, this "scandal" relied on outrageous misrepresentations of the stolen emails and did not in any way undermine the scientific consensus about climate change.

Nevertheless, conservative media figures incessantly hyped the non-scandal with their usual overblown rhetoric:

* Glenn Beck -- who says he is not a conspiracy theorist, remember -- suggested in the wake of "Climategate" that climate change is a "scam." He also said that if the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report "had been done by Japanese scientists, there is not enough knives on planet Earth for hara-kiri."

* Noted climatologist Rush Limbaugh, who frequently decries the supposed global warming "hoax," proposed that all of the scientists involved in "Climategate" should be "named and fired, drawn and quartered, or whatever it is."

* Andrew Breitbart called for "capital punishment" for NASA scientist James Hansen, because "Climategate" was supposedly "high treason."

* The Washington Times, Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter, Investor's Business Daily, The American Spectator's Robert Stacy McCain, Rich Lowry, Newsmax's James Hirsen, and Michael Ledeen all joined forces to smear the scientific consensus on climate change as a "cult."

* Fox News' Mike Huckabee explained that "Jesus would be a truthseeker" while discussing the "revelation" that scientists had "cooked" climate change data.

The crew at Fox & Friends spent this year's Earth Day promoting an important cause. No, not encouraging environmental consciousness -- they devoted the show to pushing "Climategate" falsehoods in order to falsely claim that "scientists held back data that discredits theories on global warming." They were joined by Brent Bozell of the Media Research Center, who was there to complain about non-Fox networks "dismiss" and "ignor" the story.

Last December, Bozell told Lou Dobbs that "Climategate" is the "biggest scandal in terms of science, finance, and politics ... in the history of man." After Bozell compared the climate science "cover-up" to "the craziness" of Dan Brown's fiction, he actually managed to draw laughter from Dobbs. Unfortunately, contrary to Bozell's suggestion that media outlets ignored the story, numerous non-Fox "Climategate" stories adopted conservatives' dishonest framing of the non-story.

And now for the inevitable conclusion of this manufactured controversy.

As reported by The New York Times' Andrew Revkin -- who, by the way, Rush Limbaugh thinks should "just go kill" himself -- the Independent Climate Change Email Review "cleared climate scientists and administrators" involved in "Climategate" of "malfeasance." This follows several other exonerations of the scientists involved in the phony scandal. In response, Media Matters, joined by numerous progressive and clean energy groups, called on all outlets that reported on the original "Climategate" controversy to set the record straight.

So this leaves us where we were before the "Climategate" freakout: There is still overwhelming scientific evidence supporting the theory of global warming.

And once again conservative media proved that they don't hesitate to rely on blatant distortions, outright falsehoods, and a complete disregard for reality to advance their political causes.

Mainstream media outlets would be doing everyone a service if they remembered that the next time they decide to report on whatever Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Fox News, and the perpetual conservative outrage machine are yelling about.

from protecting ourselves, loved ones and the planet we live off of. Anyone arguing against the amount of evidence already available via internet, is a fucking moron, a paid shill or a brainwashed right wing nimrod.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

There's no reason to keep doing what we're doing. Coal, Oil, Nuclear and other dirty energy sources will be the death of us, CO2 or not.

so their argument always falls short of both morality and intelligence. People who place greed higher than people are sick.

I never liked the calls of various environmentalists of "sacrifice."

A. That's an instant turnoff for me
B. You'll never get most of America onboard with such a slogan

I posit that we can do what we're doing smarter, cleaner, and totally renewable and without waste.

When you set up the argument that why, why WOULDN'T we all want a green economy? Only TPTB would object.

Hell, the American people weren't even asked to sacrifice when we were supposidly at war with terrorism...insead we were told to go shopping and the rich got a nice fat tax break.

have to face the music...

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

That about says it all. :)

The poster was obviously a freeper just here to cause trouble, but he/she so badly didn't make his/her case that the post served the opposite purpose quite well.

Rhetorical question actually..


And what do you want on your pizza?


Mods - Clean up in GD.

Signs point to no.

And that's the whole point.