Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gangsta Cheney

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 08:13 AM
Original message
Gangsta Cheney
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/6279147-dick-cheney-has-the-last-laugh
<snip>


In the weeks since the Deepwater Horizon unleashed a torrent of oil in the Gulf of Mexico, Dick Cheney’s name has been creeping back into the press. “The truth is that, right now, we have precisely the regulatory system that the Bush-Cheney administration wanted: full of loopholes, full of cronies and lobbyists filling the very agencies that are supposed to be overseeing the industry,” commentator Arianna Huffington said on ABC’s This Week on June 6. “Arianna, I don’t know what planet you live on,” Cheney’s daughter, Liz, retorted. “What you are saying has no relationship to the truth, no relationship to the facts.”

Many of the policy and regulatory failures that laid the groundwork for the BP disaster can be traced back to the Bush-Cheney era. The energy task force was created days after former oilman George W. Bush took office in 2001, and was headed by Cheney, the ex-CEO of Halliburton, one of the world’s largest suppliers of oilfield products and services. For months, the task force solicited input on US energy policy. On May 16, 2001, the group issued its last report, which was submitted to Congress in June, according to Mother Jones.

Countries, such as Norway and Brazil, require offshore rigs to install an acoustic shut-off switch, which is a remote-controlled backup system that seals off an underwater well – even if the rig above is destroyed. Minerals Management Service considered using the same precaution. But oil companies complained that the $500,000 devices were too costly and ineffective. Eventually, MMS made the switches optional in 2003. The Deepwater Horizon was not equipped with such a device. Other concerns include a failure to implement new cementing policies or act on known concerns regarding key components on drilling rigs.

“When you have a disaster of this magnitude, it raises the question, if in this whole secretive process, what was discussed, how much did the Bush administration ignore, how much did they allow the oil and gas industry to basically do what they wanted,” says Anne Weismann, chief counsel at Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington, DC. “Secrecy is so pernicious that it can continue to damage – even when the administration is not in power.”
--------------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Go back to 2001 - the news contained information that Rumsfeld and Cheney had not
Edited on Sun Jul-11-10 09:21 AM by peacetalksforall
divested themselves in their private connections to various commercial and funding in the manner expected of those who move on to the government payroll. This was never pushed by the media. To this day, I don't remember reading that it was resolved according to law. Then we hear about the secret energy meetings.

Move to the first days of the leak. The press was full of stuff about all these BP bigwigs flying in (to the rig) to celebrate some kind of milestone or anniversary. Later, we learn BP knew they were in trouble weeks before we knew about it.

Move on the news that there were disagreements/fights between four different companies involved. Now look at the news - only BP is ever mentioned.

Halliburton and Cheney are never mentioned though I admit I can't keep up the way I used to, but I think I would have seen more about them if they were in the news.

I think we know how the dominoes are falling. Rigged to exclude Cheney for 2001 activities, plus Halliburton.

My gut tells me he will be living within the protection of Dubai one day these days and Liz will still get all the air time she needs to justify him to the world.

We have had a lethal Congress and Executive and GAO and look at what the press does - continue to cover up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Good post
I too fear that he will never pay for his criminality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. This administration should have looked into Cheney's secrecy long ago
they should do it before it is too late.

I wonder why BP didn't point their finger at Halliburton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. He's still alive? I thought he died or fell into that big sinkhole in Guatemala, or something.
;)

a girl can dream...cant she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It lives.......





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. it should be drooling oil.
Edited on Sun Jul-11-10 09:57 AM by mod mom
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. So what do you think the fluid retention
that requires hospitalization was about? Toxic oil is leaking from every orifice. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC