Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

its that doggone tritium again - Mass. nuke plant event

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 09:54 AM
Original message
its that doggone tritium again - Mass. nuke plant event

http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index.php?smp=&lang=eng


Traces of radioactive tritium have been found in groundwater near the Pilgrim Nuclear Power plant. The levels are still within federal safety limits, and a spokesman says there is no threat to the public. The plant is owned by New Orleans-based Entergy Corp., a company that also owns Vermont Yankee. That facility has seen a succession of problems ever since a tritium leak there was discovered in January. Those leaks prompted Massachusetts officials and critics of the Pilgrim plant to call for stepped up monitoring of the Plymouth, Mass., facility. Six new monitoring wells were dug, and last week the first results were made public. Those results show a gradually increasing level of radioactive tritium in the monitoring test wells, though the level of contaminated water is still below the level the Environmental Protection Agency regards as safe. The groundwater from the monitoring wells registered 11,072 picocuries per liter while the EPA’s safe limit is set at 20,000 picocuries per liter. “This does not in any way affect public health or safety,” said David Tarantino, a company spokesman. “But we certainly want to discover the cause.” The company has assembled a team of experts to solve the problem, Tarantino said.
---------------------------

tritium, the curse of nuke plants and a health bane to their neighbors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. They dug six new monitoring wells
And they come up with a level of tritium under the so-called safe limit. I wonder if they needed some more monitoring wells dug to bring the average down from the other wells? I wonder what the distribution of tritium levels is across all the wells, not just the six new ones? And have those tests been replicated by someone without a financial interest in Pilgrim?

Oh well, it's not like a company would lie just to protect its own bottom line, so I'm sure there's nothing to worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. and they can count on nobody much looking in their direction
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caboose Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. And it is still far less radioactive 'pollution' than a medium sized coal burning power plant
Edited on Tue Jul-13-10 10:05 AM by caboose
unless you think Scientific American is some organ of the nuclear industry

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste

edited for typing too fast bungle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. you are the one comparing, not me


also

coal toxin and nuke toxin are not the same

the only thing they have in common is that they both sicken and kill living things
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. No they are not the same, burning coal results in both nuke AND chemical...
...toxins.


And if you'd read the bloody article linked you'd have known that. Instead you just provided proof positive for what I've long suspected. You have absolutely no interest in the truth, just your agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. And it's that doggone fear-mongering again
It's slightly over 50% of a limit that was set FAR below background radiation levels.

Arnie Gunderson should be showing up in a day or so to tell the media some new scare stories. Better than the old stories about LSD Babies!

--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sounds like they're working hard to find the source before
it becomes a real danger. Thank you once again for your post showing how careful nuclear power plants are to prevent danger to the population. You keep us informed about the successes of nuclear plant safety very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC