Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A new Teabagger queen?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 08:55 AM
Original message
A new Teabagger queen?
Has Lady Blah Blah been displaced?






by E.J. Dionne of the WaPo:


I don’t think Rep. Michele Bachmann, the very right-wing Republican from Minnesota, is doing her party any favors by creating a Tea Party Caucus in the House of Representatives. In fact, I imagine that this is the first thing Bachmann has done in a long time that will make Democrats happy.

Not surprisingly, Bachmann declared herself chair of the caucus, for which she filed paperwork on Thursday. “This caucus will espouse the timeless principles of our founding, principles that all Members of Congress have sworn to uphold,” she declared. “The American people are doing their part and making their voices heard and this caucus will prove that there are some here in Washington willing to listen."

That last part, about proving that “there are some here in Washington willing to listen," is what I suspect will make many Republicans nervous. This will put a lot of people on the line, and force some into an unappetizing choice.

A lot of Republicans would like the Tea Party to rally as many right-of-center voters to the polls as possible but not have to take any responsibility for the movement’s more radical stands or the unseemly rhetoric that issues from some of its supporters. (That now-infamous billboard in Iowa made even some Tea Party people unhappy.)

Bachmann’s move will make it harder for them to avoid the question of whether they are with the Tea party or against it. Those Republicans who do sign up could turn off more moderate voters. Those who don’t might have to worry about future primaries supported by the Tea Party. We’ve already seen how even very conservative Republicans -- Sen. Bob Bennett of Utah is Exhibit No. 1 – can be declared not-right-enough by these folks. ........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2010/07/are_democrats_chuckling_about.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bachmann should wear tea bags for ear rings
she could inspire a new look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. "she could inspire a new look"

Crackpot Chic


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJoe Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bachman is certifiable.
In former times, she would be kept locked in an attic by her relatives and spoken of as little as possible. Today every idiocy she mouths gets trumpeted to the skies by our Yellow Cable Media. As a result, she gains a forum for her rants. I prefer the old days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. At least it will give Hannity and Fox something to do - promote it endlessly.
They've already started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. The Iowa billboard- I had not seen this before-despicable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. At least they got the part right about 'radical leaders prey on the
fearful & naive' - those words pretty much describe every Teabagger I've seen yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ms. Batboy comes to the party...
Edited on Sat Jul-17-10 09:35 AM by MineralMan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. *snort*
that's classic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. Queen of the Damned, more like. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. Bennett did not loose in voting he lost in a caucus
and I think those should be illegal. They are controlled by a few who get in "first" and make sure they have the people do what they want. I think the only way to choose a candidate is by vote not by caucus. And I am outraged that a lot of states have them, especially Minnesota.

I support Obama, BUT back before Obama took the delegates from Minnesota Hillary led him in all polls by a double digit margin. When they had the caucus a lot of the places were hurriedly moved, combined and hard for those without transportation to get to. In Minnesota we are towns few and far between. Then when they did have caucus a vocal group took over a lot of the caucus causing some people to cave and leave. And I truly believe that's how Obama won the Minnesota electors. But since he was a Democrat I did vote for and support him, but I will never forget the way he got those ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC