Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Long-range Eye Tracker Enables Selling Ads 'By The Eyeball'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 09:23 AM
Original message
Long-range Eye Tracker Enables Selling Ads 'By The Eyeball'
Long-range Eye Tracker Enables Selling Ads 'By The Eyeball'

Science Daily — A Queen’s University Computing professor’s invention – recently unveiled at Google’s corporate headquarters in California – provides a unique, affordable way for advertisers to track the effectiveness of their messages by measuring how many people are looking at their billboards and screens.

Called eyebox2™, the portable device uses a camera that monitors eye movements in real time and automatically detects when you are looking at it from up to 10 meters away, without calibration. Until now, such eye-trackers have been ineffective beyond 60 centimeters, required people to remain stationary, needed personalized calibration to function, and cost more than $25,000 US. By contrast, the new walk-up-and-use eye is offered at a fraction of that cost.

snip

“Our technology allows interactive real-time “Flow of Attention” measures of customers in the real world. This allows ambient ads run in malls literally to be sold ‘by the eyeball,” says Dr. Vertegaal. “It enables brick-and-mortar stores such as Wal-mart and Sears to use a revenue model similar to Google’s online PageRank and web analytics technologies.”

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070513084620.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. That is friggin' scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 09:28 AM
Original message
Cheap sunglasses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Advertising doesn't work on me.
Edited on Sun May-13-07 09:28 AM by Clark2008
I only purchase what I need to begin with. And, when I need it, then I either turn to Consumer Reports (if it's a big ticket item) or I use something tried and true (for example, I have my fifth Mustang sitting in the garage. I like them. They're reliable and last for years with low maintenance. My last one went 10 years without even needing brakes.)

If neither of those works, I ask friends and relatives what brand they would buy of whatever it is I'm needing. I've had to purchase a lot of new baby items of late and I used updated versions of the same items I used for my son that were effective and avoided those that weren't. I didn't look at ads to make purchases.

I rarely watch TV and I skip ads in magazines. I simply don't pay attention to them.

I guess this technology would tell them who's more gullible, I suppose.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. The only ad that ever worked on me ...
... was one that was just so pathetically inept that I went and bought their product (all 20 cents worth) because I felt sorry for them. But I guess it worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. Fight back--don't look at ads
Personally, I'm a shopper who knows what she wants, goes into the stupid store, looks for it, and leaves immediately if she can't find it and goes to another store. I don't look at posters--only look at signs directing me to the department I'm looking for, such as shoes or books or towels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just Because I Look
Doesn't mean I'm going to buy.

For example, I love the Mac ads (I'm a Mac and I'm a PC). As I'm using my TiVo to zoom through ads, if I catch what looks like a new Mac ad, I stop and watch it. That doesn't mean I'll ever BUY a Mac, no matter how amusing I find their ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
5.  Fascism goes high-tech. Think this would stay in the corporate realm?
Edited on Sun May-13-07 10:00 AM by WinkyDink
Bushco will be all over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC