Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McConnell blocks vote on Stranch nomination, Reid does nothing for 8 months

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 06:22 PM
Original message
McConnell blocks vote on Stranch nomination, Reid does nothing for 8 months

Jane Branstetter Stranch
Nominee for the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
56 years old


The nom­i­na­tion of Nashville attor­ney Jane Stranch to be a judge on the 6th Dis­trict Court of Appeals remains in limbo after an effort to push it through the Sen­ate on Tues­day failed.

At the request of Repub­li­can Sen. Lamar Alexan­der, Demo­c­ra­tic Sen. Pat Leahy of Ver­mont, chair­man of the Sen­ate Judi­ciary Com­mit­tee, made a unan­i­mous con­sent request on the Sen­ate floor to set a time for a three-hour debate and vote on the nomination.

But Repub­li­can Sen­ate Major­ity Leader Mitch McConnell of Ken­tucky objected and that was the end of that.

http://blogs.tennessean.com/politics/2010/effort-to-win-approval-of-stranch-appointment-fails/

Senator Leahy: (2:56 PM)

Propounded a UC that at a time to be determined by the Majority Leader, and upon consultation with the Minority Leader, the Senate proceed to Executive Session to consider the nomination Jane Stranch to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit; that the nomination be debated for up to three hours, equally divided and controlled between Senators Leahy and Sessions, or their designees; that upon the use or yielding back of the time, the Senate proceed to vote on confirmation of the nomination (McConnell objected).


Senator Alexander: (2:59 PM)
Responded.

SUMMARY "Jane Stranch is a well-qualified nominee. It's long been my position, without going into the history of this body, that a president's nominees deserve an up-or-down vote. She is the longest pending circuit court nominee yet to be confirmed. She was nominated last August. The committee reported her in November...I know it is difficult with the amount of matters that we have on the Senate floor to schedule anything, including a circuit judge, but it would be my hope that the Republican leader and the majority leader could before long set a time certain for an up-or-down vote on Jane Stranch, the president's nominee for the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. And I would thank the senator from Vermont for his request. I will not object."


Senator McConnell: (3:01 PM)
Responded.

SUMMARY "Reserving the right to object, I know my good friend from Tennessee is interested in this nomination. There were, however, some 'no' votes on the nominee in committee, and we'll be running on our side to see if we can work out a debate time and see if we can take this nominee up in the not-too-distant future. But for the short term, at least, I must object."

http://republican.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=FloorUpdates.Home



Michael B. Keegan, President of People For the American Way, issued the following statement:

“Jane Stranch is a clearly qualified nominee, and has the support of both Republican senators from her home state of Tennessee and a bipartisan majority of the Judiciary Committee. She has now waited eight months for a simple up-and-down vote from the Senate. There is no good reason for this delay—it is instead the result of the Republican minority’s persistent, counter-productive obstructionism.

“I applaud Sen. Leahy for attempting to move this nomination so that Jane Stranch can start working for the people of Tennessee and the Senate can get back to work for the people of the United States. I urge the Republican leadership to find the time to do its job and let the Senate vote on this, and other needlessly stalled nominations.”

http://www.pfaw.org/press-releases/2010/07/gop-refuses-to-vote-jane-stranch-nomination-after-eight-months-of-stalling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another recess appointment Obama has a long long way
to go to catch up with Bush. Someone in the senate should make a list of all of Bush's recess appointments and each time Obama makes one and the republicans complain, they should read off the list.

Remember the worst one...Bolton for the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, they should have pushed her through on a cloture vote months ago, they had the votes
this is Reid's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. BLT post on this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Leahy Press Release:

Senate Republican Leader Objects – Again – To Debating Long-Pending Circuit Court Nomination

WASHINGTON (Tuesday, July 20, 2010) – The Senate Republican Leader today objected to a request from Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) to schedule debate and a vote on a long-pending judicial nomination to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

The nomination of Jane Stranch to the federal appeals court for the Sixth Circuit was reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee more than eight months ago with bipartisan support, but has languished on the Senate’s executive calendar. Today, Leahy sought agreement to schedule three hours of debate on the nomination, followed by a vote. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) objected to the request.

“With this objection, Senate Republicans have further ratcheted up the obstruction and partisanship that has become commonplace this Congress with regard to judicial nominees,” said Leahy. “I had honestly hoped that working with the respected senior Senator from Tennessee , we would be able to obtain a standard time agreement.”

http://leahy.senate.gov/press/press_releases/release/?id=32787483-dfb7-4971-b68a-a99fad0035d3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "What is being perpetuated is a shame."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC