Andrew Breitbart is a racist which makes the Washington Times a racist paper.

LynneSin

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-21-10 01:39 PM
Original message

Andrew Breitbart is a racist which makes the Washington Times a racist paper.

Edited on Wed Jul-21-10 01:40 PM by LynneSin

Will the Times continue their racist ways or continue to show that they give a platform for racists.

And anyone that gives him a microphone to defend what he did to Sherrod is racist too (I'm looking at you Fox News).

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

BrklynLiberal

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-21-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message

1. oops. Why was I shown msg that this did not post???????

Edited on Wed Jul-21-10 01:47 PM by BrklynLiberal

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

murielm99

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-21-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message

2. Kick

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

joeybee12

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-21-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message

3. KNR...it really is that simple...n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

BrklynLiberal

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-21-10 01:46 PM
Response to Original message

4. 100% truth. My guess is that there is no chance that the WT is going to change its stripes.

My guess is the RWingnuts were not winning points with straight out racism...white/on/black..so someone in their ranks...an up and coming KKKarl Rove type..like James O'Keefe wants to be...came up with the idea that if they reversed the concept...and touted black/on/white racsim..they could do batter..

Why else would someone...obviously...have sifted thru all the NAACP tapes looking for just the right speech to cut and paste in order to create this shitstorm?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

SoCalDem

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-21-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message

5. The Washington Times is not a "for-profit" paper..It's a propaganda rag

so they don't care if their writers are racist..in fact they probably prefer it.

Republicans have:
tv-----------Fox
radio--------99.99999% of it
papers------Washington Times, NewsCorp & others
book publishing..google Murdoch & publishing

liberals have???

cue crickets...

to be fair, we have recently been blessed with a few left-leaning commentators & the Nation & Mother Jones have been liberal forever..and until recently we did have a big presence online, but even that is now being swamped with rightwing blogs & websites to carry the lies online.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

KamaAina

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-21-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message

6. Racist? The Moonie Times? Naaaaaaaaah.

:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

kelly1mm

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-21-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message

7. Not a good argument. Let me rephrase:

Edited on Wed Jul-21-10 02:06 PM by kelly1mm

Pat Buchanan is a racist which makes MSNBC a racist channel.

Will MSNBC continue their racist ways or continue to show that they give a platform for racists.

And anyone that gives him a microphone to defend his point of view is racist too (I'm looking at you MSNBC).

Edit: not saying that the washington times is not racist, just that your analogy is faulty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.