Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's Afghanistan strategy under siege

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:32 AM
Original message
Obama's Afghanistan strategy under siege
Obama's Afghanistan strategy under siege

By Jim Lobe
Asia Times

July 28, 2010


WASHINGTON - Monday's release by WikiLeaks of tens of thousands of classified documents detailing the travails of the United States military in Afghanistan and Pakistan's secret support for the Taliban from 2004 through 2009 comes amid a growing crisis of confidence here in the nearly nine-year-old war.

Coming on top of the steady increase in US and North Atlantic Treaty organization (NATO) casualties in Afghanistan - July may yet exceed June as the highest monthly death toll for US and NATO forces since the war began in late 2001 - the unprecedented leak can only add to the pessimism that has spread from the liberal wing of the Democratic Party to the heart of the foreign policy establishment, and even to a growing number of Republicans.

What hope was generated by President Barack Obama's appointment last month of General David Petraeus, whose counter-insurgency (COIN) tactics are widely credited with curbing Iraq's rapid descent into all-out civil war three years ago, to command US forces in Afghanistan has largely dissipated as a result of the steady flow of bad news - of which the WikiLeaks document dump and the weekend capture by the Taliban of two US seamen in a remote part of the country were only the latest examples.

.....

While the urgency with which these alternative strategies are being floated reflects the foreign policy elite's disunity over what is to be done, recent polls suggest that public confidence in the current strategy is in steady decline.
Growing - although hardly overwhelming - majorities believe that the Afghan war, currently funded at about US$100 billion a year and which last month took the lives of 102 NATO soldiers, has not been worth the cost. Much larger majorities believe the war is either stalemated or being lost.

Public disillusionment is increasingly reflected in the US Congress where a $37 billion emergency war bill has been held up for nearly a month amid doubts about US strategy, doubts that even Petraeus appears unable to dispel.

.....

Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman John Kerry, whose loyalty to Obama's foreign policy in general and Afghanistan strategy, in particular, has been much appreciated by the White House, has become increasingly uneasy in recent weeks.

.....




Meanwhile, another Asia Times article this week reported that the U. S. Defense Department is on the verge of awarding a "priority" contract for at least $100 million to build a large U. S. Special Forces base in northern Afghanistan, near Mazar-i-Sharif, and set to become operational by the end of 2011.


Sort of explains the frantic push for Congress to authorize additional $33 Billion more in War Funding, to ensure the unchecked expansion of empire.




How difficult is it for the following two concepts to dawn on our leadership?



The. People. Of. Afghanistan. Do. Not. Want. Foreign. Occupation. Of. Their. Country.


And. Neither. Do. The. Majority. Of. Americans.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know about the "majority of Americans", since the country has shifted to the right
but I do know that the reasons for going into Afghanistan in the first place, i.e. bin laden and AQ, no longer exist

so what is the objective again?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. to prevent another 9/11 . . . . heard that the morning
could it be any more nebulous? At least "weapons of mass distruction" was not mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I certainly hope people are wiser after what we have been through, and don't fall into the trap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. priority contract . . . I smell Halliburton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. 58% of Americans: The war effort is a "lost cause"; 60% say start leaving next year, regardless.
The result, when combined with mounting monthly U.S. death tolls, has been rising discontent, both within Congress and the general public. A recent national Bloomberg poll found that 58% of Americans considered the war effort a "lost cause," while Gallup has tracked a steady increase in the percentage of Americans who believe sending U.S. forces to Afghanistan in 2001 was a mistake, from 30% when Obama took office to 38% today. TIME






From the Bloomberg poll of July 9-12, 2010:


.....

Turning to the war in Afghanistan, do you think the U.S. can win the war or do you think it is a lost cause?

36 Can win the war

58 It is a lost cause

6 Not sure



Which of the following do you think is the best policy for US involvement in Afghanistan:


60 Stick to the plan to start withdrawal of forces in July of next year, even if the country is still as unstable as it is today

37 Be open to keeping current number of forces in Afghanistan—or even adding more—if the
country is still unstable in July of next year

3 Not sure

.....




Wonder how the planned U. S. Special Forces base to be built and operational by the end of 2011 in Mazar-i-Sharif would poll? Will Gates sneak this one by us in the $33 Billion he wants from Congress 'for the war'?

Curiously, this base will become operational after we're *withdrawing.* Despite all the rhetoric, it sounds like *we are staying*. No "neutral status" for Afghanistan, no siree.



Would Americans approve of spending our money this way?


What pollster will dare to ask this question?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. and now the repubs talking points are against it...Obama needs to wake up..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. The strategy of the "Great Game" is to build an arc
of western (NATO) control from Georgia to Pakistan to insure access to central Asia and separate China and Russia from Iran and India.

Things have not gone as planned is an understatement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC