Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Isikoff: Pentagon review finds national security not endangered by WikiLeaks documents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 11:33 AM
Original message
Isikoff: Pentagon review finds national security not endangered by WikiLeaks documents
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 11:34 AM by bigtree
from Kos: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/7/27/887970/-Isikoff:-Pentagon-review-finds-national-security-not-endangered-by-WikiLeaks-documents

Jul 27, 2010 at 08:00:04 AM PDT

Despite the statement of national security adviser James Jones condemning the release of more than 92,000 classified documents as endangering national security, Michael Isikoff reports that a review by the Pentagon finds, so far, that's not the case: (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38417666/ns/world_news-south_and_central_asia)


WASHINGTON, D.C. — An ongoing Pentagon review of the massive flood of secret documents made public by the WikiLeaks website has so far found no evidence that the disclosure harmed U.S. national security or endangered American troops in the field, a Pentagon official told NBC News on Monday.

The initial Pentagon assessment is far less dramatic than initial statements from the Obama White House Sunday night after three major news organizations – The New York Times, the Guardian and Der Spiegel — published what was touted as an unprecedented “secret archive” of classified military documents relating to the war in Afghanistan. The documents appear to show, among other matters, close collaboration between elements of the Pakistani intelligence service and the Taliban — an awkward issue that U.S. intelligence officials have strenuously complained about for some time but are loath to talk about publicly....

But David Lapan, deputy assistant secretary of defense for media operations, told NBC News on Monday that a preliminary review by a Pentagon “assessment” team has so far not identified any documents whose release could damage national security. Moreover, he said, none of the documents reviewed so far carries a classification level above “secret” — the lowest category of intelligence material in terms of sensitivity.

read: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/7/27/887970/-Isikoff:-Pentagon-review-finds-national-security-not-endangered-by-WikiLeaks-documents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kerry: "it compromises the efforts of our troops in the field, potentially"
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 11:37 AM by Oregone
"it breaks the law and equally importantly it compromises the efforts of our troops in the field, potentially."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8824434
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. it was a curious defense by the senator and the WH
. . . and they're pressed to find something in there which makes their paranoid, hawkish case against the documents. Kerry would be better off opening his Foreign Relations Committee to investigate the claims he says are exaggerations (and the others) and let the public decide, rather than dig himself in with a deeper defense of the clusterfuck there. He has a great deal of political stock invested in the Pakistan end of the enterprise, so I expect he'll follow this defense with more nonsense about 'progress' and such to avoid having the plug pulled on all of the funding he's pushed through for Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Like an ex-girlfriend, he's "changed"
:)

But I suppose everyone changes over the course of many decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Pentagon announced they will tell everyone where the important
info is at todays press conference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC