Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NOAA: BP spill has toxic effect on air quality in US cities; effects shellfish many miles from site

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:46 PM
Original message
NOAA: BP spill has toxic effect on air quality in US cities; effects shellfish many miles from site
The toxic effects are making themselves known on people living in cities on the mainland U.S. and on Gulf shellfish miles from the site of the BP oil spill. The evaporating oil slick, which is itself the major source of deadly aromatic hydrocarbon emissions, will continue spreading for months after the gusher is plugged, according to scientists.

While BP is expected to finally plug the Deep Horizon well as soon as next week to great fanfare, the toxic effects will continue for months and years to come.

OP:
http://www.envirotech-online.com/news/air-monitoring/6/breaking_news/bp_spill_having_effect_on_us_air_quality/11017/ - BP spill 'having effect on US air quality'
The BP oil spill has had a negative effect on the air quality of US cities, a report has shown.

Scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) released details of their research into the air quality of states close to the Gulf of Mexico explosion that occurred on April 20th.

They revealed that 15 to 17 kilometres downwind from the location of the spill, there were concentrations of chemicals in the air that were much higher than should be expected in urban areas.


The health effects of aromatic hydrocarbon emissions from oil slicks, such as benzene and other known carcinogens, are well understood.

http://www.exponent.com/petroleum_hydrocarbons/ The petroleum constituents of primary interest to human health have been the aromatic hydrocarbons (i.e., benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylenes), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), gasoline additives (e.g., MTBE, TBA), and combustion emissions from fuels (e.g., carbon monoxide, benzene, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, diesel particulates).


Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH)

The aromatic hydrocarbons are identified as chemicals of interest for health risk assessments at most petroleum-contaminated sites and for sites affected by petroleum solvent. Benzene is the only aromatic hydrocarbon classified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and other health and environmental agencies as a “known human carcinogen,” and therefore, is the primary focus of many petroleum hydrocarbon risk assessments. Exponent has conducted hundreds of site risk assessments where benzene was a chemical of concern. The potential exposure to benzene at a petroleum-contaminated site depends on the concentrations of benzene in the soil, water, and air, and the frequency and duration of expected human contact with the contaminated media. If the petroleum release was gasoline from an underground tank, benzene will likely be found in soils and possibly also in shallow groundwater and air. The volatilization of benzene in subsurface soils and shallow groundwater and its migration into buildings (vapor intrusion), have recently become a risk assessment focus that has led to the reopening of Records of Decision (RODs) at a number of sites. Benzene and the other aromatic hydrocarbons are taken up through the skin, lung, and digestive system, so all three routes of exposure (dermal uptake, inhalation, and incidental ingestion) need to be considered in assessing health risks.


The BP spill also has lasting effects on the Gulf food chain, as well. PAH residues have been previously observed in mussels in shallow sedimentary layers more than 15 kms from the source:

http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0048969779900184 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) have been determined, by glass capillary gas chromatography, in two species of bivalves (Mytilus edulis and Modiolus modiolus) and sediments of Saudafjorden, Norway. The PAH observed are derived from waste effluents from a ferro alloy smelter. Up to 34 PAH compounds were identified, including some reported to be carcinogenic. The concentrations decreased rapidly with distance from the source and with sediment depth, but could be traced more than 15 km from the source.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, leveymg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for making sure that the true scope of this disaster is not overlooked.
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 01:00 PM by BrklynLiberal
The tragedy is far from over just because the well may be capped.
The extensive, long-term, wide range damage to many, many species of plant and animal life has not even begun to be rectified.
In fact, the worst may be yet to come.

Those articles do not even begin to go into the toxic effects of the dispersants that were used...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. I will be sure to keep this kicked.
NOW can people please send messages to WH?
Let's not let this be a repeat of the 911 responder disaster.

btw....one of the reasons I retired early, 2 years after 911, was because my profession required me to be a first responder, and after seeing how careless the government is with people's lives in emergencies, including people in the military, I decided I wanted the option of deciding when and where to help.

Local community crisis? I have, and will, volunteer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. They will nickel/dime people to death, literally....

and forget about the environment, some bought scientists and an army of lawyers will mitigate that.

And all of that done in the name of 'due diligence', the investors will be pleased.

Ain't Capitalism grand?

k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good thing "pre-existing conditions" will be phased out one day.
Altho that will be in what....2014?

Insurance companies may end up paying for this problem in a big way.

Not, of course, as much as Gulf Coast residents will, by a long shot.

Jeez...I am only 90 miles due north of the Gulf, and a lot of our rain comes from Louisiana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. "affects"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hasn't BP suffered enough?
Really. Think of who really stands in harm's way: BP's brave shareholders, like Tony the Yachtsman and JP Morgan Chase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Nope

Never, not ever.

Expropriate without compensation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. "Expropriation without compensation" - I call that a fine. Let's see, at $3,000 per barrel spilled
that adds up to about $150 billion, or so . . . the U.S. Treasury just about owns BP at this point, if the maximum fines under the Pollution Act were actually imposed.

We should demand the maximum, and not a penny less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. yes, there are others who should be called to task for this Disaster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC