Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Waxman Dismisses Industry Criticism of Oil Spill Response Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:09 PM
Original message
Waxman Dismisses Industry Criticism of Oil Spill Response Bill
Yay, Mr. Waxman. Don't give them an inch!

http://washingtonindependent.com/92698/waxman-dismisses-industry-criticism-of-oil-spill-response-bill

Waxman Dismisses Industry Criticism of Oil Spill Response Bill
By Andrew Restuccia 7/27/10 1:21 PM


Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) is not moved by the oil industry’s argument that House oil spill legislation would prematurely require specific blow-out preventer technology and other well design measures.

Industry groups like the American Petroleum Institute say the cause of the April explosion on the Deepwater Horizon well should be determined before Congress passes a law requiring specific technology. Waxman — who chairs the House Energy & Commerce Committee and, along with Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), has conducted a months-long investigation into the oil spill — disagrees.

In a conference call with reporters today, he said:

I think it makes a lot of sense to put in the requirements that we are putting in that make sure the blow-out preventer works and the well design and cementing requirements are adequate. We don’t freeze this in place, but we do know from our hearings that these were the mistakes that were made…


Responding to criticism from American Petroleum Institute President Jack Gerard that the requirements would stifle necessary innovation in well technology, Waxman said the secretary of the Interior Department is allowed to to update the standards when necessary:

We allow the secretary to have the flexibility to adopt different specific standards if these other standards would provide greater safety. So, I don’t know what Mr. Gerard’s complaint would be. If he’s got a way to handle this in a safer manner then he can argue to the secretary of the Interior and have them as the minimum requirements. Perhaps he’d like to have no minimum requirements, but I think that would be a mistake.


The provisions were included in a bill authored by Markey, Waxman and Stupak, parts of which were incorporated into the oil spill package House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) unveiled yesterday. Markey noted that the bill passed out of committee unanimously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC