Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dodd Nixes Elizabeth Warren Recess Appointment Option

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:07 PM
Original message
Dodd Nixes Elizabeth Warren Recess Appointment Option
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/27/dodd-nixes-elizabeth-warr_n_661115.html Rest of Article

I will not be sorry to see the back of him heading out the door...



As far as the Democratic base is concerned, the best choice to head up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is Elizabeth Warren. And the Obama administration agrees that Warren is well-qualified to head up the agency essentially inspired by her. But confirming E-Dubs, that's another story! That would take political will or large Congressional majorities or something. And so there's a lingering doubt whether Warren is "confirmable."

Robert Gibbs is among those who think Warren's confirmation is doable. However, Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) disagrees, telling TPM's Brian Beutler, "I don't know, that's the question, how does he know that?"

Ahh, but what about using one of those recess appointment thingies? As our own Sam Stein reported today, the White House is "hint strongly" that some recess appointments are in the offing for the upcoming August recess. Dodd tells Beutler that this would be a really bad idea:

"I think that would be a huge mistake," Dodd said, in response to a question from TPMDC. "Recess appointments. No, no, no."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. When Warren fails to get the spot, are we really going to pretend
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 06:11 PM by Marr
that it's the fault of someone like Christopher Dodd? Give me a break.

The Administration does not want her in that spot, but it's an election year and they know what their base wants. They're going to maneuver themselves into a position where they can claim they were for it, but 'just couldn't get it through Congress'. We've seen them do this little jig about twenty times now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. "We" won't pretend....
...but sadly, many on here and elsewhere will pretend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Dodd will be a contributing factor, the fucker. He needs to go home
and suck the corporate tit that he has been fronting for the past year and leave the rest of us alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. The exec can do this on its own.
Dodd, that corrupt shithead, has no say in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. WTF is with Dodd?
He used to be sane. Is his post-Senate gig THAT lucrative?

And anyway, I thought this position didn't need Senate confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No kidding.He has turned into one fugly,
floating turd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Hey! Rahm, Summers, and Clinton got vast millions from Wall Street.
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 06:33 PM by MannyGoldstein
Why deny Dodd his share?

So unfair!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jah the baptist Donating Member (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. he has always been a bank whore
good on most other issues

but whoring for financial institutions has always been his mo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. They don't call them 'Masters of the Universe' for nothing.
And Sen. Dodd knows his Master's voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. There USED to be a time
When that doggy DIDN'T sit beside that phonograph machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Sort of like Biden for the credit card industries
I get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. check what he does after he slithers out and you will know all you
need to know. His dad was a corrupt fucker too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who cares what he thinks? I sure don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. He doesn't have the right to nix recess appointments.
He can spout off all he wants, no one has to listen to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. It IS a fucking emergency Dodd.
Those of us that aren't millionaires need someone like her in there kicking some ass.

It's easy to see where Dodd's allegiance is. And it ain't to us proles on the bottom.

What an asshat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. As Cenk would say, "Of COURRRRRRRRRRSE!" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. Warren would be an immediate lame duck if she received a recess appointment
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 07:11 PM by tritsofme
In a position that is going to require a whole lot of work.

If she was not confirmed by the whole Senate by the time the new Congress convenes in January, her recess appointment would expire.

I really doubt we see a recess appointment in the CFPB nominee, regardless of who it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. worthwhile "lame duck" vs. just-plain-lame nominee...
I think I know which way I would lean... but I'm no woodchuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. "That would be a huge mistake"
Yeah, because people might mistake us for a party with a fucking spine...

Who gives a shit what the Republicans think anymore? What are they going to do? Cry? Fuck them, we should be ramming liberals down their throats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC