|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 06:07 PM Original message |
Dodd Nixes Elizabeth Warren Recess Appointment Option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. When Warren fails to get the spot, are we really going to pretend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vi5 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 06:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. "We" won't pretend.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 10:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. Dodd will be a contributing factor, the fucker. He needs to go home |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. The exec can do this on its own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
3. WTF is with Dodd? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 06:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. No kidding.He has turned into one fugly, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 06:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Hey! Rahm, Summers, and Clinton got vast millions from Wall Street. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jah the baptist (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 06:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. he has always been a bank whore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 06:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. They don't call them 'Masters of the Universe' for nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 07:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. There USED to be a time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 07:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Sort of like Biden for the credit card industries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 10:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. check what he does after he slithers out and you will know all you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
4. Who cares what he thinks? I sure don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
8. He doesn't have the right to nix recess appointments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
10. It IS a fucking emergency Dodd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
12. As Cenk would say, "Of COURRRRRRRRRRSE!" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
13. Warren would be an immediate lame duck if she received a recess appointment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LooseWilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 07:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. worthwhile "lame duck" vs. just-plain-lame nominee... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-27-10 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
19. "That would be a huge mistake" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC