Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Document Reveals Military Was Concerned About Gulf War Vets' Exposure to Depleted Uranium

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 10:22 AM
Original message
Document Reveals Military Was Concerned About Gulf War Vets' Exposure to Depleted Uranium
Edited on Wed Jul-28-10 10:23 AM by kpete
Source: Truthout

Document Reveals Military Was Concerned About Gulf War Vets' Exposure to Depleted Uranium

Wednesday 28 July 2010

by: Mike Ludwig, t r u t h o u t | Report

For years, the government has denied that depleted uranium (DU), a radioactive toxic waste left over from nuclear fission and added to munitions used in the Persian Gulf and Iraq wars, poisoned Iraqi civilians and veterans.

But a previously undisclosed 1993 Defense Department document written by then-Brigadier Gen. Eric Shinseki, now the secretary for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), shows that the Pentagon was concerned about DU contamination and the agency had ordered medical testing on all personnel that were exposed to the toxic substance.

The VA, however, never conducted the medical tests, which may have deprived hundreds of thousands of veterans from receiving medical care to treat cancer and other diseases that result from exposure to DU.

The Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center recently reported that ten years of data confirm that service members tend to have higher rates of certain cancers compared to civilians, according to the Army Times. http://www.armytimes.com/news/2010/07/military_cancer_rates_statistics_072010w/ While researchers suspected that service members are diagnosed with cancer more often and at a younger age because they have guaranteed access to health care and mandatory exams, the data does not explain the disparities in diagnosis among branches of the military. For example, the rate of lung cancer among sailors is twice that of other branches, while Marines have much lower cancer rates across the board.



Read more: http://www.truth-out.org/document-reveals-military-was-concerned-about-gulf-war-vets-exposure-depleted-uranium61781
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crowman1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm sure there were a few generals who gave a damn.
But most of the higher ranks and civillians working in the pentagon didn't want to lose that cushy executive job from the same companies who created these poisons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. ...and yet there is a jerk here who claimed this is all bull shit because he handled the stuff.
Of course handling DU shells and breathing in the dust after the impact and disintegration is a whole other situation. I finally put him on ignore since he obviously is a military shill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I did a presentation on a local cable outlet on DU a few years ago.
Even handling the shells isn't safe. The reports I saw talked about the high incidence of rectal cancer in soldiers who repeatedly sat on crates of DU ammo in the back of Bradley Fighting Vehicles in Iraq.

And the person you referred to also asserted that DU exits the body through urine. Not so. It's detectable in urine, but it settles in the lungs, bones and other tissue. And it just keeps irradiating it's victims for life.

I did the show 6 years ago, and don't have my notes anymore. And I'm too lazy to go back and research it again.

But, the shit should be banned. Period. Along with white phosphorous ammo and napalm that we supposedly don't use any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Where else should we dispose of nuclear waste, Nevada?
DU. Ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC