Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Medical Marijuana... 'What Part of “Not a Priority” Does the DEA Not Understand?' - FDL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 06:45 PM
Original message
Medical Marijuana... 'What Part of “Not a Priority” Does the DEA Not Understand?' - FDL
What Part of “Not a Priority” Does the DEA Not Understand?
By: Michael Whitney Wednesday July 28, 2010 12:18 pm

<snip>

Earlier this month the DEA conducted several coordinated raids of California medical marijuana dispensaries and collectives. The federal agents raided a medical marijuana farm in the northern county of Mendocino, as well as a dispensary in San Diego. They destroyed all the marijuana plants and seized the grower’s computer and cash from the property.

Problem is, these DEA raids are in direct opposition to the directive issued by President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder last year that designated raids on legal medical marijuana dispensaries to “not be a priority” for the DEA. The places raided by the DEA were not just in total compliance with state and local laws, but the raided farm was the very first to come into legal compliance with local authorities.

Greenfield had applied in the name of her collective, “Light The Way,” which opened in San Diego earlier this year. Her property had passed a preliminary inspection by the Mendo sheriff’s deputies shortly before the raid, and she had bought the sheriff’s “zip-ties” intended to designate her cannabis plants as legal.

In the days before the raid, Greenfield had seen a helicopter hovering over her property; she inquired with the sheriff, who told her the copter belonged to the DEA and wasn’t under his control.

The agents invaded her property with guns drawn, tore out the collective’s 99 plants and took Greenfield’s computer and cash.

Joy was not at home during the raid, but spoke on the phone to the DEA agent in charge. When she told he she was a legal grower under the sheriff’s program, the agent replied, “I don’t care what the sheriff says.”


So today, Firedoglake publisher Jane Hamsher joined drug policy reform organizations and a conservative group, led by the Marijuana Policy Project, in condemning the DEA’s raids.

Two ideologically diverse advocates today echoed an earlier call by a coalition of drug-policy reform groups and condemned a series of recent raids by the Drug Enforcement Administration on medical marijuana collectives that were operating legally under state law. The Tenth Amendment Center, a group that advocates on behalf of states’ rights, and Jane Hamsher, the publisher of FireDogLake.com, called on the DEA to respect duly adopted state medical marijuana laws and immediately end these raids.


The DEA is out of control. The agency and its acting administrator, Michele Leonhart, are clearly flouting a direct order from the Attorney General and the President of the United States. But Leonhart isn’t just an acting administrator – President Obama nominated her to take the job full time, but her nomination is stalled in the Senate.

Jane Hamsher singled out Leonhart in her criticism of the DEA’s raids:

“At least 73% of Americans support medical marijuana, according to recent polls, and its use has been made legal in 14 states plus the District of Columbia,” said Jane Hamsher, publisher of progressive political blog and advocacy group Firedoglake.com. “Attorney General Eric Holder was crystal clear last year when he directed officials within his department not to waste federal resources interfering with state medical marijuana laws. Yet throughout the tenure of President Obama’s administration, the DEA’s raids have continued in a manner wholly inconsistent with the spirit of that directive.

“What part of “not a priority” does Michele Leonhart not understand?”


Drug policy organizations were quick to organize against these unlawful raids. Along with the Marijuana Policy Project, groups like Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, NORML, Drug Policy Alliance, and Students for Sensible Drug Policy all joined in a petition to Obama to withdraw Leonhart’s nomination to head the DEA. It’s a smart move, and is much needed if the Obama Administration was actually serious about making senseless medical marijuana raids “not to be a priority” for federal law enforcement.


<snip>

Link: http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/07/28/what-part-of-not-a-priority-does-the-dea-not-understand/

One has to wonder what other agencies under WH control, are ignoring the policies OF the WH.

:shrug:

:mad:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Local rw DA's or sherrifs trying to make political bones on the backs of
Edited on Wed Jul-28-10 06:48 PM by asdjrocky
compassionate care givers. Of course the DEA rats are willing to help. What a surprise.

And look, Obama conveniently looks the other way.

When you know the people that are going to jail, it gets pretty real.

K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not much.
Generally speaking, the cops are sick of busting for pot. The DEA does what they want. Many times, the local LEOs do not want them there. We have it worked out real nice with the local cops(for the most part).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Really?
Could you possibly give us some details?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Many clubs have a great relationship with local government.
Including the cops. The DEA gets a hard on for a club or a few of them every once in awhile, and they come in and do their thing. The local cops don't want them there, much less requesting that the DEA come in and bust pot clubs.

Wher I live, you have to practically beg to get busted for pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Perhaps we need to look at this as a model?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. ANYONE who works for the DEA is a COWARD.
The Whitehouse would be correct to bring the hatchet down on the DEA for defying an order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Without pot, the DEA is a much smaller institution. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. their jobs depend on reefer madness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Wow... Keeping Pot Illegal... Becomes A Jobs Program...
:banghead:

:beer:

:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC