Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Right Reacts Preemptively to Expected Prop 8 Loss

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 11:50 AM
Original message
Right Reacts Preemptively to Expected Prop 8 Loss
The decision in the Proposition 8 trial is expected soon and backers of Prop 8 are expecting to lose, which is why they have already filed papers seeking a stay on the decision as they appeal it to the Ninth Circuit.

And Bishop Harry Jackson has already released a statement voicing his outrage about it via a series of Twitter posts:

Prop 8 Decision Threatens Core Civil Right to Vote for Marriage -This is a travesty of justice. The majority of Californians - and two-thirds of black voters in California - have just had their core civil right to vote for marriage stripped from them by an openly gay federal judge who has misread history and the Constitution to impose his San Francisco views on the American people.

The implicit comparison Judge Walker made between racism and marriage is particularly offensive to me and to all of us who remember the reality of Jim Crow.

It is not bigotry it is biology that discriminates between same-sex couples and opposite-sex couples. To make a marriage requires a husband and a wife because these unions are necessary to make new life and connect children to their mother and father.

Judge Walker’s slur will not stand the test of time and history. We demand that Congress and the Supreme Court act to protect all Americans’ right to vote for marriage.


http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/right-reacts-preemptively-expected-prop-8-loss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't understand how they have a 'core civil right to vote', but don't believe Prop 8
discrminates. How can anybody have a right to vote on someone else's rights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's the propaganda, I tell you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillStein Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. I love his convenient use of science
Funny how biology is determinative when it supports his bigotry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. So marriage is only for creating new life?
"To make a marriage requires a husband and a wife because these unions are necessary to make new life and connect children to their mother and father."

So that should mean that sterile couples and people not wanting kids should be disallowed from marriage as well.

Ridiculous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carnage251 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think its gonna go to the supreme court and the supreme court five are gonna overturn the ruling.
GFYS harry jackson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. "openly gay" federal judge?
His sexual orientation seems to be more in the "worst-kept secret" category. Look for the H8ers to use that as grounds for appeal, 'cause since they know for sure he's gay, he should've recused himself. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbixby Donating Member (716 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Isn't it ironic
that he's decrying Jim Crow, but at the same time advocating the same policies as Jim Crow, just against homosexuals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. KO, are you reading this?
We got a worst person candidate here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC