Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican Extremists Push for Nullification

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 06:25 PM
Original message
Republican Extremists Push for Nullification
Posted by stevebenen at 10:13 am
August 8, 2010

Republican Extremists Push for Nullification
Posted by stevebenen on @ 10:13 am


This post first appeared on Washington Monthly.

A couple of weeks ago, Rep. Zach Wamp (R-Tenn.) talked up secession. “I hope that the American people will go to the ballot box in 2010 and 2012 so that states are not forced to consider separation from this government,” Wamp told National Journal. Wamp went on to praise Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R), who has referenced “dissolving” the Union, for also raising concerns about the U.S. government’s “oppressive hand.”

This Civil War talk has been echoed by other Republicans, including Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), and disgraced former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas).

All of this, of course, is insane. It’s hardly news that contemporary Republicans have become more radical, but this secession talk helps drive the point home nicely.

Dana Milbank takes this one step further in his column today, noting that some of the secession talk among Republicans has been repackaged, though it’s every bit as extreme.

Most conservatives know it sounds loopy to talk about dissolving the union. After all, it didn’t go so well the last time around. That’s why it’s more acceptable to talk about secession’s cousin, nullification. Calling themselves “Tenthers” (for the 10th Amendment, which gives states powers not assigned to the feds) they’re claiming that states can merely ignore any federal law they don’t like. (...)

But nullification, like secession, has been tried before, with poor result. In 1832, Andrew Jackson threatened to use force against South Carolina for nullifying federal law, saying the state was on the brink of treason and argued that “to say that any state may at pleasure secede from the Union is to say that the United States is not a nation.” A compromise held off violence for another quarter century. (...)

If a state thinks the law is unconstitutional, it can challenge the law in court, as Virginia is doing. If people don’t like the law, they can elect a new Congress and president to repeal it. Or, they can attempt to amend the Constitution, as several Republican lawmakers would do with the proposed repeal of the 14th Amendment, the one with all that nonsense about equal protection under the law. But secession and nullification have all the legitimacy of a temper tantrum.


But that tantrum is nevertheless becoming increasingly common, as evidenced by Tom Emmer, the Republican gubernatorial candidate in Minnesota, who believes states should reject all federal laws unless explicitly endorsed by supermajorities in state legislatures.

There is no better example of hysterical Republican extremism. Such madness would have been laughed at by the GOP mainstream not too long ago, but is now a familiar component of the Republican message of the 21st century.


http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/08/08/republican-extremists-push-for-nullification/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Their newfound reverence for the "goddamned piece of paper"
is very touching
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mysuzuki2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Apparently all of these boobs slept through high school history class
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder if
there any way to check if these extremists are dominionists. If so they are certifiably serious in their mission to replace the Constitution with biblical law Most people just think this is all conspiracy talk but it is not. I have met some of these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red red red Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. I never really...
thought they were funny. I have always believed this could turn serious. The whole thing here is if it could/would ever happen, do you really think it would satisfy the nuts - HELL NO! They would just nullify the next one, then the next, and on and on and on. There is no way they can be satisfied. JMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Target's contributions to Emmer's campaign should be reason for massive consumer boycott
imo by reason of this issue alone: Emmer's stand, if correctly portrayed, would be tantamount to giving the Constitution, that "god-damned piece of paper" in junior's view if I recall correctly, a pumping middle finger of each hand. Incredible stuff that you just can't make up. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC