Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More Election Fraud

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 03:46 PM
Original message
More Election Fraud
Dateline 1876, Democratic presidential candidate Samuel J. Tilden holds a clear and commanding lead in the popular vote over his Republican opponent Rutherford B. Hayes. But what's this? Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina and Oregon have all submitted two different certified vote counts. One gives the electoral votes to the Republican and the other gives the votes to the Democrat. With the crucial electoral votes necessary to win in the balance what's a country to do?

The Republican-controlled Congress appoints a committee of 7 Democrats and 8 Republicans to investigate. Their findings? The 7 Democrats vote to give the electoral votes to the Democrat and the 8 Republicans vote to give the electoral voters to the Republican. So that's how we ended up with A Republican president come 1977. Oh, the poor Democrats. They got snookered. But wait. There's more. Telegrams came to light proving that the Democrats had tried to buy off some of the Republican delegates, so there's plenty of guilt to go around on both sides of the aisle.

So you think what we're seeing today in partisan politics is something new and unprecedented? Think again. This kind of crap has been going on in American politics since before the Declaration of Independence was even signed.

There are times when, as I read some history, I begin to think that to even be interested in politics is a monumental waste of time. The game is rigged. Always has been, and always will be. We are no more than excited spectators watching a staged public exhibition put on to keep us distracted from what's really going on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
2 Much Tribulation Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, there certainly is a history. But fraud much harder w/ voting system that leaves evidence!
And an observable count is the only thing that leaves evidence. That's why STORIES can be told about paper ballot fraud and only "theories" in most cases advanced when the counts are secret because they are computerized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC