Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MV-22 Osprey Or CH-53K As Marine’s Next “Heavy” Lifter?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 06:47 AM
Original message
MV-22 Osprey Or CH-53K As Marine’s Next “Heavy” Lifter?


MV-22 Osprey Or CH-53K As Marine’s Next “Heavy” Lifter?
By Craig Hooper
Defense Tech Naval Warfare Analyst

In a little-noticed deployment shift, deputy commandant for aviation, Lt. General Trautman told Inside the Navy that the 40-year old CH-53D choppers are retiring before their previously reported FY18 and FY19 sundown dates. Fine. But then Trautman used his July 28 interview to quietly change policy, claiming that MV-22s–not Sikorsky’s new heavy-lift CH-53Ks–were going to replace the CH-53D helos!

What’s with that? What does it mean for the Post-Afghanistan Marine Corps?

Ospreys were originally slated to replace CH-53D “medium lift” helicopters, but at some point in 2007–8, the Marine Corps formally decided replace their aging CH-53Ds with CH-53Ks.

Look at the numbers–The FY 2010 Marine Corps Aviation plan (warning: big .pdf)– suggested the three remaining 10-ship squadrons of CH-53Ds would meld into two “plus-uped” 16-ship CH-53D squadrons in FY11. Those two squadrons would then be among the first to upgrade to the CH-53K in FY18 and 19 (the third squadron, now stripped of aircraft, would go into cadre status and transfer to MV-22s in FY16). So while the Osprey got an extra squadron, the CH-53Ks replaced the Deltas on a one for one basis.

The shift has been pretty sudden. As late as April 13, 2010, Trautman was telling the Senate this:



unhappycamper comment: So what the hell is the military doing resurrecting 40-year old heavy lift choppers?

It turns out the $100 million dollar MV-22 Osprey may not be up to the task:

V-22 Sticker Shock

V-22 Costs Soar

Why Tiltroters Fail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. You're not mentioning the $27 billion we spent DEVELOPING the Ospry's...
Edited on Tue Aug-17-10 07:28 AM by FormerDittoHead
$100 million apiece almost sounds like a bargain when you consider we already dug a hole to China and filled it with money for this dream.

I can only imagine what $27 billion in R&D could have done if applied to something like alternative energy or robotics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC